Skip to content

docs: 리드미 초안 2 (#181)#182

Merged
Neibce merged 1 commit intodocs/readmefrom
main
Aug 24, 2025
Merged

docs: 리드미 초안 2 (#181)#182
Neibce merged 1 commit intodocs/readmefrom
main

Conversation

@Neibce
Copy link
Owner

@Neibce Neibce commented Aug 24, 2025

  • Update README.md

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

  • docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...


Important

Updates README.md with comprehensive details about the application's purpose, features, user interface, installation, and team experiences.

  • README.md Updates:
    • Adds detailed description of the application, including its purpose and key features.
    • Describes the application's target audience and the need for such an application.
    • Provides a comprehensive guide on the application's features, including health tracking and communication functionalities.
    • Details the user interface and user experience design tailored for different user demographics.
    • Explains the reward system and its role in encouraging app usage.
    • Outlines the application's installation process for both iOS and Android platforms.
    • Includes a section on the team's experience and feedback from a hackathon event.
    • Provides a list of technologies used in the development of the application.

This description was created by Ellipsis for d839c5b. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

* Update README.md

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...

* docs: 리드미 초안 작성 중...
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 24, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch main

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Neibce Neibce merged commit c1b7c23 into docs/readme Aug 24, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to d839c5b in 1 minute and 43 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 331 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 8 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. README.md:3
  • Draft comment:
    Use consistent Markdown image syntax and add more descriptive alt text for accessibility.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. README.md:444
  • Draft comment:
    Remove the extraneous comma after '표시된다' for correct punctuation.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. README.md:5
  • Draft comment:
    Consider adding a table of contents after the title to enhance navigation in this extensive README.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. README.md:1111
  • Draft comment:
    The '설치 및 사용 방법' section is quite lengthy; consider summarizing or moving detailed instructions to a separate file.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.
5. README.md:640
  • Draft comment:
    Avoid using HTML
    tags within Markdown tables; use Markdown-native line breaks for consistency.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.
6. README.md:135
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical: It seems there's no space after the period in "유도한다.단순한 경쟁이 아닌 ...". Consider adding a space after the period to improve readability.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.
7. README.md:268
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical consistency: The header reads "사회적가지 도입 계획" but the section below refers to "사회적 기여(What)". Should "사회적가지" be changed to "사회적 기여" for consistency?
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment points out an inconsistency, it's a minor typographical issue. The meaning is still clear and the suggested change is more about style than substance. The comment doesn't identify a clear code issue that needs to be fixed. The inconsistency could potentially cause confusion for readers. Headers should ideally use consistent terminology. However, this is a documentation change that doesn't affect functionality. The meaning is still clear despite the minor terminology difference. This comment is about a minor documentation style issue rather than a substantive code problem that needs fixing.
8. README.md:433
  • Draft comment:
    Typo fixed: The text was corrected from "우츳" to "우측". Ensure such typos are reviewed for consistency across all user-facing texts.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is purely informative, pointing out a typo fix and suggesting to ensure consistency across user-facing texts. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written. It also doesn't ask for confirmation of intention in a specific way. Therefore, it violates the rules.

Workflow ID: wflow_NgxVq3RpVU28nqCs

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant