Conversation
Initial draft for a CoC
sunzenshen
requested changes
Apr 11, 2026
|
|
||
| ### 2. Unacceptable Behavior | ||
|
|
||
| The following behaviors is a non-exhaustive list of violations of our standards: |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"following behaviors is"
v
"following behaviors are"
| > **[codeofconduct@neotokyorebuild.com](mailto:codeofconduct@neotokyorebuild.com)** | ||
|
|
||
| All reports will be reviewed and investigated. We are committed to maintaining the confidentiality of the reporter and will take all necessary steps to ensure they are protected from retaliation. | ||
| If you have specific accomodations in mind with regards to this, please let us know and we'll doour best to make you comfortable. |
|
|
||
| ### 1. Scope and Standards | ||
|
|
||
| This code applies within all project spaces and when an individual is officially representing the project in public spaces. We expect contributors to uphold the following standards: |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
within all project spaces of the Neotokyo;Rebuild project
?
|
|
||
| > **[codeofconduct@neotokyorebuild.com](mailto:codeofconduct@neotokyorebuild.com)** | ||
|
|
||
| All reports will be reviewed and investigated. We are committed to maintaining the confidentiality of the reporter and will take all necessary steps to ensure they are protected from retaliation. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the context of some other orgs I have reviewed CoC drafts for, two things that might come up are:
- Lack of clarity of who reviews reports, which may relate to concerns about retaliation
- What is the appeals process, particularly in cases where there is an appeal regarding the decisions of one party and a request for a second opinion
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Initial draft for a CoC
Partially inspired by the contributor covenant, but mostly based on research articles from the ACM on moderation.
First section is bascially a "why", to save people time if a discussion/argument about policy comes up, just point whoever has questions to that instead of wasting time on back and forth on things we've already agreed to, the second section is a bit more "how".