Conversation
|
I want you to perform the gatekeeper checks for latest PR state check for regressions |
|
Gatekeeper review for latest PR state. Request understood: review-only pass for regressions, implementation quality, and better alternatives. Assumption: no branch changes requested unless explicitly asked. VerdictRequest changes. The implementation builds and typechecks, but I would not merge this as-is because it regresses touch scrolling of the tab strip. Blocking Finding
Non-Blocking Quality Notes
Checks Run
Gatekeeper SummaryThe state-management approach is simple and mostly clean, and the drag/drop library API usage is valid. The touch scrolling regression is significant enough to block merge until the draggable surface no longer disables native horizontal scrolling across the entire tab. -- |
|
Review updated changes |
|
Updated gatekeeper review for latest PR state. Request understood: re-review the updated changes after the prior blocking feedback. Assumption: this is still review-only. VerdictApproved from gatekeeper review. I do not see any blocking regressions in the updated diff. Prior Blocker StatusResolved. The previous blocker was FindingsNo blocking findings. Residual Risks / Suggestions
Checks Run
Gatekeeper SummaryThe updated implementation fixes the touch-scrolling regression, keeps the state change minimal, and passes the relevant UI verification checks. I would merge this PR if the team is comfortable with the added -- |
No description provided.