I'm not sure if this should rather be classified as a bug but since zfs is not explicitly supported, I'm putting it as a feature request:
[s6-finish] sending all processes the TERM signal.,
[s6-finish] sending all processes the KILL signal and exiting.,
[s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0.,
[s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0.,
[fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes...,
[fix-attrs.d] done.,
[cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts...,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-niceness.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-niceness.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-script.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-script.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-user-map.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-user-map.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-logmonitor-states.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-logmonitor-states.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-tmp-dir.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-tmp-dir.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-app-deps.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-app-deps.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-home.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-home.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-take-config-ownership.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-take-config-ownership.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-xdg-runtime-dir.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-xdg-runtime-dir.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] nginx-proxy-manager.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] nginx-proxy-manager.sh: Initializing database data directory...,
[cont-init.d] nginx-proxy-manager.sh: exited 1.,
[services.d] stopping services,
[services.d] stopping s6-fdholderd...,
[cont-finish.d] executing container finish scripts...,
[cont-finish.d] done.,
[s6-finish] syncing disks.,
[s6-finish] sending all processes the TERM signal.,
[s6-finish] sending all processes the KILL signal and exiting.,
[s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0.,
[s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0.,
[fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes...,
[fix-attrs.d] done.,
[cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts...,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-niceness.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-niceness.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-script.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-script.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-user-map.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-app-user-map.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-logmonitor-states.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-logmonitor-states.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-tmp-dir.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-clean-tmp-dir.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-app-deps.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-app-deps.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-home.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-set-home.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-take-config-ownership.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-take-config-ownership.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] 00-xdg-runtime-dir.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] 00-xdg-runtime-dir.sh: exited 0.,
[cont-init.d] nginx-proxy-manager.sh: executing... ,
[cont-init.d] nginx-proxy-manager.sh: Initializing database data directory...,
[cont-init.d] nginx-proxy-manager.sh: exited 1.,
[services.d] stopping services,
[services.d] stopping s6-fdholderd...,
[cont-finish.d] executing container finish scripts...,
[cont-finish.d] done.,
[s6-finish] syncing disks.,
[s6-finish] sending all processes the TERM signal.,
It took me a felt eternity to figure out that the reason why this wasn't working was that I was using the "wrong" filesystem. zfs doesn't work because apparently it doesn't support fallocate (which NPM seems to use).
I'm not sure if this should rather be classified as a bug but since zfs is not explicitly supported, I'm putting it as a feature request:
Currently, the container will not work if you map
/configonto a zfs volume. The logs will look like this:It took me a felt eternity to figure out that the reason why this wasn't working was that I was using the "wrong" filesystem. zfs doesn't work because apparently it doesn't support
fallocate(which NPM seems to use).So if it is possible to avoid
fallocate, that would make NPM compatible with zfs. I can see, though, that this is probably not a priority for you so I'd like to suggest to warn users about this (either in the instructions) or, ideally, by detecting thatfallocateis not working and issuing and error about this (and possibly stopping the container).