Skip to content

Feat/summarise#35

Merged
incizm merged 3 commits intomainfrom
feat/summarise
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

Feat/summarise#35
incizm merged 3 commits intomainfrom
feat/summarise

Conversation

@incizm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@incizm incizm commented Jun 19, 2025

Added summary function: Uses locally hosted LLM to summarise generated transcript.

incizm added 2 commits June 18, 2025 14:48
summarisation function added (call local llm)

fixing the variables that are unbound to reduce errors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @incizm, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily introduces a new feature that allows for the summarization of audio transcripts. It integrates with an external, locally hosted Large Language Model (LLM) to process transcripts and generate concise summaries, significantly enhancing the utility of the application by providing quick insights into recorded conversations.

Highlights

  • New Feature: Transcript Summarization: I've introduced a new capability to summarize generated transcripts using a locally hosted Large Language Model (LLM). This involves a new summarise_transcript function that makes an HTTP POST request to a configurable LLM API endpoint.
  • New API Endpoint: A new API endpoint, /jobs/{uuid}/summarise (POST), has been added. This endpoint allows users to request a summary for a specific transcript identified by its UUID, leveraging the new summarization logic.
  • Configuration Updates: The .env.example file has been updated to include new environment variables (LLM_API_URL and LLM_MODEL_NAME) required for configuring the LLM service, making the summarization feature configurable.
  • Dependency Management: The requests library has been added to backend/requirements.txt to facilitate HTTP communication with the external LLM API.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a summarization feature for transcripts using an LLM. Key changes involve adding new API endpoints, utility functions for interacting with the LLM, and related configuration. The review identified several issues, including hardcoding the compute device, potential crashes due to unhandled missing environment variables, incorrect processing of transcript files which breaks existing functionality and the new feature, and unsafe dictionary access that could lead to KeyErrors. Addressing these points is crucial for the stability and correctness of the application.

Comment thread backend/main.py Outdated
Comment thread backend/main.py
Comment thread backend/main.py Outdated
Comment thread backend/main.py
Comment thread backend/main.py
Summarises the transcript for the given UUID using a defined LLM.
"""
try:
file_name = get_file_name(uuid)["file_name"]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Accessing get_file_name(uuid)["file_name"] directly is unsafe. If get_file_name(uuid) returns an error dictionary (e.g., {"error": "UUID not found"}), this will raise a KeyError. You should check if the 'error' key exists in the response from get_file_name before attempting to access "file_name".

        file_name_response = get_file_name(uuid)
        if "error" in file_name_response:
            logging.error(f"Failed to get file name for UUID {uuid} in summarise_job: {file_name_response['error']}")
            return {"error": f"Failed to retrieve file details for UUID {uuid} to start summarization."}
        file_name = file_name_response["file_name"]

Comment thread backend/main.py
Comment thread backend/main.py Outdated
@incizm incizm merged commit e08bc74 into main Jun 19, 2025
2 checks passed
@incizm incizm deleted the feat/summarise branch June 19, 2025 02:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant