Conversation
ce0fd9f to
9e99a62
Compare
|
Runbot display fail but is runing... why?? |
|
See the video to know how to get to the problem: Peek.14-02-2021.21-54.mp4 |
9e99a62 to
0fc7384
Compare
pedrobaeza
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems the migration commit contains black/prettier formatting. Can you please isolate that one so it's not contaminated with it and the review is done more accurately?
| <field name="model_id" ref="model_agreement" /> | ||
| <field | ||
| name="domain_force" | ||
| >['|', ('company_id', '=', False), ('company_id', 'child_of', [user.company_id.id])]</field> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This rule must be transformed and migration scripts should be added. See in https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-13.0 the line about that.
0fc7384 to
9db8c24
Compare
we move the is_template field definition and the agreement.type model from the agreement_legal module to the agreement module. The fields are not displayed by default, unless the feature is enabled through a technical feature group, this is configurable in the agreement_sale module (because agreement in itself has no UI, and agreement_legal enables the feature by default)
- The `agreement` model now features mail and activities from its base module. - The `agreement_legal` module doesn't need to add mail support now. - Add activities to form views. @Tecnativa TT22477
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: contract-12.0/contract-12.0-agreement Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/contract-12-0/contract-12-0-agreement/
Update agreement and agreement_sale to restore the behavior of v10
9db8c24 to
129a028
Compare
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at c3cdae1. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
cc @Tecnativa TT27165
ping @carlosdauden @CarlosRoca13
Superseeds PR #578 without name changed.