Skip to content

Port project categ to v8#7

Merged
dreispt merged 2 commits intoOCA:8.0from
dreispt:port-project-categ
Jul 23, 2014
Merged

Port project categ to v8#7
dreispt merged 2 commits intoOCA:8.0from
dreispt:port-project-categ

Conversation

@dreispt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dreispt dreispt commented Jul 22, 2014

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 256d0b4 on dreispt:port-project-categ into 2edc3bd on OCA:8.0.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For these cases, isn't better to leave the translation blank?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure; probably this takes them out of unstranslated lists.

@bwrsandman
Copy link
Copy Markdown

In porting to 8.0. We should be using the new api.

@dreispt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

dreispt commented Jul 22, 2014

I agree on using the new API, but the priority is to get modules installable on v8, so we can work on database migrations. So, I would prefer to work on that (and on test coverage) at a later stage.

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I also agree with Daniel. First: get v8 compatibility with minimal changes. Second: refactor with new API.

Regards.

@eLBati
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

eLBati commented Jul 23, 2014

On 07/22/2014 04:15 PM, Pedro M. Baeza wrote:

I also agree with Daniel. First: get v8 compatibility with minimal
changes. Second: refactor with new API.

👍

dreispt added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2014
@dreispt dreispt merged commit 7a30b50 into OCA:8.0 Jul 23, 2014
zamberjo referenced this pull request in aurestic/project Nov 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants