Skip to content

Update dotfiles#896

Merged
OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit intoOCA:16.0from
acsone:16.0-update-dotfiles
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

Update dotfiles#896
OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit intoOCA:16.0from
acsone:16.0-update-dotfiles

Conversation

@sbidoul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sbidoul sbidoul commented Feb 17, 2026

No description provided.

@sbidoul sbidoul marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 16:22
@sbidoul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sbidoul commented Feb 17, 2026

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-896-by-sbidoul-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@amh-mw amh-mw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the .pylint changes have lost alphabetical order? This makes it difficult to determine what has changed, if anything.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 8a54b61 into OCA:16.0 Feb 17, 2026
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8a54b61. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@sbidoul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sbidoul commented Feb 17, 2026

It looks like the .pylint changes have lost alphabetical order? This makes it difficult to determine what has changed, if anything.

I just applied the OCA repo template, that change comes right from there.

@sbidoul sbidoul deleted the 16.0-update-dotfiles branch February 17, 2026 16:28
@sbidoul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sbidoul commented Feb 17, 2026

@amh-mw specifically this change to rules order comes from OCA/oca-addons-repo-template#317

@amh-mw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

amh-mw commented Feb 17, 2026

I will watch that repository from now on. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants