Skip to content

Conversation

@chienandalu
Copy link
Member

@chienandalu chienandalu commented Mar 26, 2025

Tasks done:

  • Refactor to the new web client framework
  • Adapt to new layout

Peek 27-03-2025 11-20

cc @Tecnativa TT54366

please review @CarlosRoca13 @sergio-teruel

@chienandalu chienandalu force-pushed the 18.0-mig-web_filter_header_button branch 2 times, most recently from 8e25391 to ac2c345 Compare March 27, 2025 10:19
Copy link
Contributor

@CarlosRoca13 CarlosRoca13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 please @sergio-teruel review

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration web_filter_header_button

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 18.0 milestone Apr 10, 2025
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2025
45 tasks
@CarlosRoca13
Copy link
Contributor

I've found a bug and I'm looking for a way to fix it. I'll let you know as soon as I have it.

chienandalu and others added 7 commits May 2, 2025 10:55
Now we can configure group filters to show up along the other filters so
users can easily access those as well.

TT49232
When there are too many buttons, they won't fit in the window and they
will overlap with other ui elemnets. We can prevent it putting them in
their own row.

TT49431
In custom views, like the reconciliation one, that use the control panel
we must prevent loading the FilterButton component.

TT49664
@CarlosRoca13 CarlosRoca13 force-pushed the 18.0-mig-web_filter_header_button branch from ac2c345 to 2e6d4ce Compare May 2, 2025 08:55
@CarlosRoca13
Copy link
Contributor

The error was caused by field-type filters, but it doesn't make sense for them to be in the header buttons because they require a value to be evaluated. So, the easiest solution is to exclude them in the initial filter.

@CarlosRoca13
Copy link
Contributor

Please @sergio-teruel review this PR 😄

Copy link
Contributor

@sergio-teruel sergio-teruel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review Ok!!

@CarlosRoca13
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-3133-by-CarlosRoca13-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 32e66b7 into OCA:18.0 May 2, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at a8c9721. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants