Skip to content

fix: remove duplicate C14.3.2 (tamper-evident logs)#322

Merged
ottosulin merged 1 commit intoOWASP:mainfrom
RicoKomenda:fix/remove-duplicate-C14.3.2-log-integrity
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

fix: remove duplicate C14.3.2 (tamper-evident logs)#322
ottosulin merged 1 commit intoOWASP:mainfrom
RicoKomenda:fix/remove-duplicate-C14.3.2-log-integrity

Conversation

@RicoKomenda
Copy link
Contributor

C14.3.2 required audit logs to be tamper-evident and include integrity verification mechanisms. This is already fully covered by C13.1.6, which requires log integrity protection via cryptographic signatures or write-only storage for all AI system logs.

C14.3.2 added no unique security value: it applied the identical technical requirement (immutable/tamper-evident logs) to the same artifact (audit logs) without any meaningful scope differentiation. C13.1.6 is the authoritative general control; implementers applying C13 already satisfy the intent of C14.3.2.

C14.3.2 required audit logs to be tamper-evident and include integrity
verification mechanisms. This is already fully covered by C13.1.6, which
requires log integrity protection via cryptographic signatures or write-only
storage for all AI system logs.

C14.3.2 added no unique security value: it applied the identical technical
requirement (immutable/tamper-evident logs) to the same artifact (audit logs)
without any meaningful scope differentiation. C13.1.6 is the authoritative
general control; implementers applying C13 already satisfy the intent of C14.3.2.
Copy link
Collaborator

@ottosulin ottosulin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed C13 is the right place for that control.

@ottosulin ottosulin merged commit 1e4701e into OWASP:main Mar 23, 2026
2 checks passed
@RicoKomenda RicoKomenda deleted the fix/remove-duplicate-C14.3.2-log-integrity branch March 24, 2026 09:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants