Skip to content

History / dms_split_convex_polygon

Revisions

  • #1305 dms_split_convex_polygon_keilsnoeyink and dms_convex_polygon_connectivity, and the grouped forms of dms_polygon_connectivity Two new pages, since 20.24.0: - dms_split_convex_polygon_keilsnoeyink: the minimum number of strictly convex parts for a polygon without holes, what falls back to Hertel and Mehlhorn, the measured counts and times, and when it does not pay: in the connectivity of grown parts the split cost more than the fewer parts saved. - dms_convex_polygon_connectivity: the four forms of dms_polygon_connectivity with convex polygons as premise, the exact test per pair, the slivers it finds that the sweep rounds away, and how much it saves (5 to 20%, since finding the candidates takes most of the time). dms_polygon_connectivity: the forms with a group per polygon, no pair within a group and one pair per pair of groups, the direction of a pair of groups with one and with two sets, and the measured advice to grow the polygons themselves when only their pairs are needed. dms_split_convex_polygon, dms polygon operators and polygon operators: the new operators listed and linked; the testcase description covers both split operators. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

    @MaartenHilferink MaartenHilferink committed Oct 11, 2026
  • #1305 dms_split_convex_polygon: the measured gap to the minimum, not "usually close to it" On every 200th outline of the BAG (57,290), Hertel-Mehlhorn gives 17% more parts than the minimum for rings without holes, and an outline with one inward corner sometimes gets three parts where two would do. The page said the count was usually close to the minimum; it now gives the gap and points to #1305, which proposes the minimum for polygons without holes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

    @MaartenHilferink MaartenHilferink committed Oct 11, 2026
  • #1300 dms_split_convex_polygon: a new page, since 20.24.0 What the parts are (their union is dms_polygon of the element, strictly convex, a convex element stays one part, small but not minimal, independent of how the input is written, no added vertices), the subitems it shares with dms_split_polygon, and why convex parts are useful. Linked from polygon-operators, dms-polygon-operators (with its testcase in the examples) and dms_split_polygon. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

    @MaartenHilferink MaartenHilferink committed Oct 10, 2026