This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 10, 2024. It is now read-only.
Bunch of October Updates to the developer docs#50
Merged
Conversation
Added info to reflect the fact that we contribute to or even run other people's GitHub orgs.
Bolds, gihub, git, content delivery network and data
This could do with some more info adding
caprenter
changed the title
Bjwebb
reviewed
Nov 17, 2016
| - tags, branches, HEAD~2, hash, short hash 0 for use with the git diff | ||
| etc. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Push to 2 remotes at once |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok - can you fix?
|
|
||
| `git remote set-url --add` | ||
|
|
||
| ### git blame a diff |
Bjwebb
force-pushed
the
october-update
branch
from
ebaac99 to
9f32f4e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A bunch of lots of minor updates to the existing developer docs. I think a review would allow to close most of the issues referenced. They may not be comprehensive, but I think it probably means the issue can be closed, brought under control and future improvements can be made as and when.