Conversation
…lean up layout files Signed-off-by: Daniel Ntege <danientege785@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ntege <danientege785@gmail.com>
danielmarv
force-pushed
the
nextjs-readme
branch
from
d33e161 to
61a43da
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request enhances the developer onboarding experience by expanding the README documentation and cleaning up unnecessary inline comments from page components. The changes focus on improving clarity and maintainability without altering any functional code.
Changes:
- Enhanced README with comprehensive sections on linting, repository structure, web components build process, and deployment details
- Removed redundant organizational comments from multiple page components (layout.tsx, about/page.tsx, contact/page.tsx)
- Clarified technology stack description in the opening paragraph
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Added lint, repo structure, web components build, and deployment sections; clarified tech stack description |
| src/app/layout.tsx | Removed explanatory comments about root layout delegation to locale layout |
| src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx | Removed obvious comments about locale validation and message provisioning |
| src/app/[locale]/contact/page.tsx | Removed organizational section marker comments (Header, Content, Decorative lines) |
| src/app/[locale]/about/page.tsx | Removed organizational section marker comments (Hero Background, Decorative images) |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| # Open Elements Website | ||
|
|
||
| This repository contains the Open Elements website. | ||
| This repository contains the Open Elements website built with Next.js and Tailwind CSS, with legacy Hugo content kept for migration and historical content. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The phrase "with legacy Hugo content kept for migration and historical content" is redundant, using "content" twice in close proximity. Consider rephrasing to "with legacy Hugo content kept for migration and historical reference" or "with legacy Hugo content retained for migration purposes".
|
|
||
| ## Web components build | ||
|
|
||
| Custom elements in `react-src` are bundled with esbuild via `react-src/build.mjs` into `public/js`. This output is treated as generated code. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The README states that web components are bundled to public/js, but the actual build.mjs script in react-src/build.mjs (line 15) outputs to ../static/js/. This discrepancy between documentation and implementation could confuse developers. Either the README should be corrected to match the actual output path in build.mjs, or the build.mjs script should be updated to output to the correct location.
1 participant
This pull request updates documentation and refines code comments to improve clarity and maintainability. The most significant changes include enhancements to the
README.mdfor onboarding and developer experience, and the removal of redundant or unnecessary inline comments from several page components.Documentation improvements:
README.mdto clarify the tech stack (Next.js, Tailwind CSS, legacy Hugo content), added sections for linting, repo structure, web components build process, and deployment details. [1] [2]Code comment cleanup:
src/app/[locale]/about/page.tsx,src/app/[locale]/contact/page.tsx, andsrc/app/[locale]/layout.tsxto streamline the code and improve readability. (src/app/[locale]/about/page.tsxL38, src/app/[locale]/about/page.tsxL50, src/app/[locale]/contact/page.tsxL14, src/app/[locale]/contact/page.tsxL30, src/app/[locale]/contact/page.tsxL46-L51, src/app/[locale]/layout.tsxL68-L74, src/app/layout.tsxL26-L27)