[WIP] Add issue and PR templates and CI workflows by Copilot · Pull Request #285 · OpenElements/open-elements-website

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:42:33Z

Review existing workflow files
Fix ci.yml: Update pnpm action to v4, pnpm version to 10, Node.js to 22.x, branches to next-js-migration, and use --if-present flag
Fix pr-automation.yml: Separate TS/JS labels, fix CSS/postcss pattern, improve test/config/docs/build regex patterns
Fix issue-automation.yml: Use toLower() for case-insensitive matching, add body check for feature detection

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

…gnment

Copilot

Pull request overview

This pull request introduces GitHub templates and CI workflows to improve automation and standardize issue/PR management. The PR is marked as WIP (Work in Progress) with a checklist identifying several issues that need to be fixed in the workflow files.

Changes:

Added CI workflow for automated testing and building
Added PR automation workflow for auto-labeling and assignment
Added issue automation workflow for auto-labeling bug reports and feature requests
Added PR and issue templates to standardize contributions

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 19 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
.github/workflows/ci.yml	New CI workflow for linting, type-checking, testing, and building
.github/workflows/pr-automation.yml	New automation for auto-labeling PRs based on changed files
.github/workflows/issue-automation.yml	New automation for auto-labeling and assigning issues
.github/pull_request_template.md	New template to standardize pull request descriptions
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml	New structured template for bug reports
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml	New structured template for feature requests
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml	Configuration to disable blank issues and provide discussion link

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:15Z

.github/workflows/ci.yml

+    branches: [main, develop]
+  pull_request:
+    branches: [main, develop]


The branches should include 'next-js-migration' to match the existing e2e-tests.yml workflow. The PR description checklist mentions updating branches to 'next-js-migration', and the existing workflow triggers on [main, next-js-migration].

Suggested change

branches: [main, develop]

pull_request:

branches: [main, develop]

branches: [main, develop, next-js-migration]

pull_request:

branches: [main, develop, next-js-migration]

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:15Z

.github/workflows/issue-automation.yml

+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Auto-label bug reports
+        if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') || contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug')


The case-sensitive check 'contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug')' will not match 'Bug', 'BUG', or other case variations. According to the PR description, toLower() should be used for case-insensitive matching. Use 'contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'bug')' instead.

Suggested change

if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') || contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug')

if: contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'bug') || contains(toLower(github.event.issue.body), 'bug')

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:16Z

.github/workflows/issue-automation.yml

+            })
+
+      - name: Auto-label feature requests
+        if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'feature') || contains(github.event.issue.title, 'enhancement')


The PR description mentions adding a body check for feature detection, but the feature request detection only checks the title. Consider adding 'contains(toLower(github.event.issue.body), 'feature') || contains(toLower(github.event.issue.body), 'enhancement')' to also detect feature requests from the issue body content.

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:16Z

.github/workflows/ci.yml

+      - name: Setup pnpm
+        uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2
+        with:
+          version: 8


According to the PR description, the pnpm version should be updated to 10. However, the existing e2e-tests.yml workflow uses version 8. Consider whether this should be consistently updated across all workflows, or if version 8 should be retained to match the existing configuration.

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:16Z

.github/workflows/pr-automation.yml

+              if (file.match(/test|spec/)) labels.add('tests');
+              if (file.match(/package\.json|tsconfig|eslint|tailwind/)) labels.add('configuration');
+              if (file.match(/README|\.md$/)) labels.add('documentation');
+              if (file.match(/next\.config|public/)) labels.add('build');


The build pattern 'next.config|public' is overly broad and will match any file containing these strings in their path, such as 'my_next.config_backup.txt'. According to the PR description, build regex patterns need improvement. Use more specific patterns like 'next.config.(js|ts|mjs)$|^public/' to match Next.js config files and the public directory.

Suggested change

if (file.match(/next\.config|public/)) labels.add('build');

if (file.match(/(next\.config\.(js|ts|mjs)$|^public\/)/)) labels.add('build');

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:19Z

.github/workflows/pr-automation.yml

+
+            files.forEach(fileObj => {
+              const file = fileObj.filename || '';
+              if (file.match(/\.(ts|tsx|jsx|js)$/)) labels.add('typescript');


The labeling logic combines TypeScript and JavaScript files under a single 'typescript' label. According to the PR description, TS/JS labels should be separated. Consider creating distinct labels for TypeScript files (.ts, .tsx) and JavaScript files (.js, .jsx).

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:19Z

.github/workflows/pr-automation.yml

+              if (file.match(/\.(ts|tsx|jsx|js)$/)) labels.add('typescript');
+              if (file.match(/\.(css|scss|postcss)$/)) labels.add('styling');
+              if (file.match(/test|spec/)) labels.add('tests');
+              if (file.match(/package\.json|tsconfig|eslint|tailwind/)) labels.add('configuration');


Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:19Z

.github/workflows/issue-automation.yml

+            })
+
+      - name: Auto-label feature requests
+        if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'feature') || contains(github.event.issue.title, 'enhancement')


The feature request detection should use case-insensitive matching with toLower() as mentioned in the PR description. Use 'contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'feature') || contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'enhancement')' instead.

Suggested change

if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'feature') || contains(github.event.issue.title, 'enhancement')

if: contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'feature') || contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'enhancement')

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:20Z

.github/workflows/issue-automation.yml

+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Auto-label bug reports
+        if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') || contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug')


The condition 'contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug')' may fail if the issue body is null or empty. GitHub issues can have an empty body. Add a null check before accessing the body: 'contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') || (github.event.issue.body && contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug'))'

Suggested change

if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') || contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug')

if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') || (github.event.issue.body && contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug'))

Copilot · 2026-02-24T19:49:20Z

.github/workflows/ci.yml

+          cache: 'pnpm'
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile


The existing e2e-tests.yml workflow uses 'pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile', while this CI workflow uses '--frozen-lockfile'. For CI consistency and to prevent builds from failing due to lockfile mismatches, '--frozen-lockfile' is generally the better choice as it ensures the lockfile matches package.json exactly. However, consider whether this should be aligned with the existing workflow convention, or if the existing workflow should be updated as well.

Suggested change

run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile

run: pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile

danielmarv and others added 3 commits February 24, 2026 22:23

Add issue and PR templates, CI workflows, and automation scripts

34ba429

Refactor PR automation script to improve file handling and label assi…

7463cd7

…gnment

Initial plan

1efb8db

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and danielmarv Feb 24, 2026

Copilot AI mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2026

Add issue and PR templates, CI workflows, and automation scripts #284

Merged

Copilot started work on behalf of danielmarv February 24, 2026 19:42 View session

danielmarv force-pushed the 239-newsletter-page-rendering-and-functionality branch from 7463cd7 to bc64d63 Compare February 24, 2026 19:43

danielmarv marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2026 19:44

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 24, 2026 19:44

github-actions bot added the documentation label Feb 24, 2026

danielmarv merged commit 9e0b94b into 239-newsletter-page-rendering-and-functionality Feb 24, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of danielmarv February 24, 2026 19:44 View session

Copilot AI requested a review from danielmarv February 24, 2026 19:44

Copilot stopped work on behalf of danielmarv due to an error February 24, 2026 19:44
The session was cancelled by the user.

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[WIP] Add issue and PR templates and CI workflows#285

[WIP] Add issue and PR templates and CI workflows#285
danielmarv merged 3 commits into239-newsletter-page-rendering-and-functionalityfrom
copilot/sub-pr-284

Copilot AI commented Feb 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

	if: contains(github.event.issue.title, 'bug') \|\| contains(github.event.issue.body, 'bug')
	if: contains(toLower(github.event.issue.title), 'bug') \|\| contains(toLower(github.event.issue.body), 'bug')

	if (file.match(/next\.config\|public/)) labels.add('build');
	if (file.match(/(next\.config\.(js\|ts\|mjs)$\|^public\/)/)) labels.add('build');

	if (file.match(/package\.json\|tsconfig\|eslint\|tailwind/)) labels.add('configuration');
	if (file.match(/^(package\.json\|tsconfig\.json\|eslint\.config\.(js\|mjs\|cjs)\|tailwind\.config\.(js\|ts))$/)) labels.add('configuration');

	run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
	run: pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Feb 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Copilot AI commented Feb 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading