Update Makefile of ReLAPACK#3770
Conversation
|
Ahem, wouldn't that break the default build by enforcing relapack prefixes even when not desired ? |
|
You're right @martin-frbg, we should only add a prefix if Do you have an idea how can check the value of |
|
It would probably make sense to have tighter integration with the OpenBLAS makefiles, i.e. moving the INCLUDE_ALL from config.h to a RELAPACK_INCLUDEALL in Makefile.rule (so that one does not have to hack around in the ReLAPACK internals) and then having the ReLAPACK makefile add |
|
Sorry, I did not intend to deny you recognition but the changes got a bit out of hand, what with the preexisting bugs in the cmake files and the need to integrate with the hackish GEMMT I already had lying around |
|
It's perfectly fine @martin-frbg! I don't know well CMake. |
We need this modification if we want to compile
ReLAPACKand also not override the .o and symbols generated by LAPACK (INCLUDE_ALL=0inrelapack/config.h).