fix typo

[uniontech-lilinjie]

Signed-off-by: lilinjie lilinjie@uniontech.com
fix typo

[martin-frbg]

Thanks - this is actually "historic" documentation from the original GotoBLAS project, not sure we even want to touch it.

[Mousius]

@martin-frbg what would be the best approach to tidying this up?

[martin-frbg]

@Mousius I am questioning if this needs tidying up at all. Maybe these old docs need to be moved to their own directory, and a unified set of documentation created (e.g. integrating parts of the gh wiki)

[Mousius]

@Mousius I am questioning if this needs tidying up at all. Maybe these old docs need to be moved to their own directory, and a unified set of documentation created (e.g. integrating parts of the gh wiki)

That's what I was getting at, if they're not useful and we're not maintaining them we could just remove them? Git history will preserve them 😸

[martin-frbg]

Removing them is a bit much I think, especially as they serve as a reminder of the GotoBLAS heritage - at least it irks me when people assume or even claim that OpenBLAS was created from scratch in 2010, when it really is just a continuation of a much older work that had quite an impact in its time.

[Mousius]

Removing them is a bit much I think, especially as they serve as a reminder of the GotoBLAS heritage - at least it irks me when people assume or even claim that OpenBLAS was created from scratch in 2010, when it really is just a continuation of a much older work that had quite an impact in its time.

Isn't the initial line in the README enough to inform people? Could also add a Heritage section or similar? It worries me that this contribution is here because of the confusion introduced by retaining the older files.