Skip to content

Conversation

@GarmashAlex
Copy link
Contributor

Updated P256 example function signatures from internal pure to internal view.
Reason: P256.verify and P256.verifyNative are view functions

@GarmashAlex GarmashAlex requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2025 10:17
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 31, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3a9e349

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifying two internal \\_verify functions from pure returns (bool) to view returns (bool) declarations. This allows these functions to read state or data within their execution, while maintaining the same parameters and return type. The observable behavior and calls to underlying verification methods remain unchanged. No public or exported function signatures are affected.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title clearly describes the specific change: updating P256 example functions from pure to view. The title directly matches the changeset summary which confirms that two internal _verify functions were changed from pure to view. The title is concise, specific, and would allow a developer scanning the history to understand the primary modification without ambiguity.
Description Check ✅ Passed The PR description is directly related to the changeset, explaining that P256 example function signatures were updated from internal pure to internal view. It also provides context for why this change was made, noting that P256.verify and P256.verifyNative are view functions. The description is specific and conveys meaningful information about the changes, aligning with the documented modifications.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2eee49 and 3a9e349.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/modules/ROOT/pages/utilities.adoc (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: slither
  • GitHub Check: tests-foundry
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: halmos
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/modules/ROOT/pages/utilities.adoc (2)

43-51: Accurate P256 example mutability.

The change from pure to view correctly reflects that P256.verify is a view function. Since pure functions cannot call view functions in Solidity, this correction ensures the example code is correct and can actually compile and run.


60-69: Accurate P256 verifyNative example mutability.

The change from pure to view correctly reflects that P256.verifyNative is a view function. This maintains consistency with the previous P256 example and ensures both documentation examples can actually compile.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Amxx Amxx changed the base branch from master to typo-fixes October 31, 2025 13:57
@Amxx Amxx merged commit 599e66b into OpenZeppelin:typo-fixes Oct 31, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants