fix(api): correct the behavior of blowout when using a .meniscus target

[ryanthecoder]

Overview

Due to the way that the movement logic of blow out is handled, it expects an absolute point. So when a location is a meniscus relative type, then it miscalculates the "delta" of the point. The delta it computes is -1 * the absolute point of the well.top.

To correct this if the location passed into blowout is a meniscus relative location, we take the offset from that and apply it to the current well height instead. this gives us the correct absolute point.

The other option would have been to hook up all the layers to handle LiquidHandlingWellLocation types in addition to WellLocation but that has its own headaches since its not actually liquid handling, and there is no operational volume.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

Using blowout with a meniscus relative location without a liquid-probe or load liquid will now fail analysis. there is no interaction with a "minimum liquid height" so there is no worries there. even with a liquid height of 0

[sfoster1]

Let's add a test, and also if this is a thing that can fail if there's an invalid volume we should note it down somewhere that the command will fail unrecoverably if the volume is invalid

[sfoster1]

Thank you!