Skip to content

Conversation

@cloalenka
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cloalenka cloalenka requested a review from bialger October 25, 2025 00:47
@bialger bialger linked an issue Oct 25, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@bialger bialger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally a good job. However, there are some code style issues and a problem with ISP at import processor, I recommend separating the graph thing from the rest of the class. And also I would do the thing with include paths in the UI method. All in all, there are some good decisions, but some changes would not hurt.

Copy link
Contributor

@bialger bialger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All in all a good job! However, I think there is room for improvement: mostly code style, but I suggest using more expandable design in the directive processor. We can merge it after all of these changes are done.

bialger
bialger previously approved these changes Nov 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@bialger bialger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks fine, a good job!

Copy link
Contributor

@sashbek sashbek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Вроде с кайфом

@bialger bialger merged commit 14632ae into master Nov 4, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement preprocessor

4 participants