Skip to content

Update dependencies for patch release #298

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

Update dependencies for patch release #298

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

@jamesrweb
Copy link
Member

@jamesrweb jamesrweb commented Dec 6, 2023

Updates all dependencies except vitest since vitest breaks when using a version greater than 1.x.x. This needs investigated but is probably something to do with the issue from the vite / rollup infrastructure, just like the issues with vite versions less than vite@5.0.4 in the 5.x.x range.

@jamesrweb jamesrweb added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security This label applies to security issues labels Dec 6, 2023
@jamesrweb jamesrweb requested a review from yevdyko December 6, 2023 13:13
@jamesrweb jamesrweb self-assigned this Dec 6, 2023
yevdyko
yevdyko approved these changes Dec 7, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@yevdyko yevdyko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

@jamesrweb jamesrweb merged commit 8712228 into master Dec 7, 2023
@jamesrweb jamesrweb deleted the update-dependencies-for-patch branch December 7, 2023 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yevdyko yevdyko yevdyko approved these changes

Assignees

@jamesrweb jamesrweb

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security This label applies to security issues

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jamesrweb @yevdyko