Skip to content

Name and indentation correction in GitHub workflow#78

Merged
drtechie merged 2 commits intoPSMRI:developfrom
techy4shri:workflow
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

Name and indentation correction in GitHub workflow#78
drtechie merged 2 commits intoPSMRI:developfrom
techy4shri:workflow

Conversation

@techy4shri
Copy link
Contributor

@techy4shri techy4shri commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

📋 Description

JIRA ID:
Closes Issue Link

Corrected indentation and structure in .github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml to resolve a syntax error. The build job and its steps are now properly nested under jobs, ensuring the workflow runs as expected on pull requests to master and develop.

✅ Type of Change

  • 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which resolves an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🔥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 🛠 Refactor (change that is neither a fix nor a new feature)
  • ⚙️ Config change (configuration file or build script updates)
  • 📚 Documentation (updates to docs or readme)
  • 🧪 Tests (adding new or updating existing tests)
  • 🎨 UI/UX (changes that affect the user interface)
  • 🚀 Performance (improves performance)
  • 🧹 Chore (miscellaneous changes that don't modify src or test files)

ℹ️ Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated formatting and indentation in the build workflow for consistency.
    • Changed the job name from "Build" to "build" in the workflow.

@techy4shri
fix(build-on-pull-request.yml): name and indentation correction in gi…
9f6e1c6 
…thub workflow

Corrected indentation and structure in .github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml to resolve a
syntax error. The build job and its steps are now properly nested under jobs, ensuring the workflow
runs as expected on pull requests to master and develop.

"fix PSMRI#78"
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The .github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml workflow file was updated to modify formatting and indentation, standardize the job name from Build to build, and adjust the branch list formatting. The steps for setting up Node.js and running build commands were re-indented to be nested under the Java setup step, but no logic, commands, or parameters were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml Reformatted indentation, changed job name to lowercase, adjusted branch list formatting, re-indented steps as sub-steps under Java setup. No logic or command changes.

Poem

In the warren where workflows run,
Indents shift and jobs are spun.
"Build" to "build"—a subtle tweak,
Formatting fresh, logic unique.
The carrots align, the steps in a row,
A tidy burrow where actions flow!
🥕

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2319ae and 9f6e1c6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml (1)

8-43: Indentation and structure correction is accurate—LGTM!

The indentation, job naming, and step nesting are now correct. This resolves the workflow syntax error and aligns with GitHub Actions best practices. No further action needed.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@techy4shri techy4shri changed the title fix(build-on-pull-request.yml): name and indentation correction in GitHub workflow Name and indentation correction in GitHub workflow Apr 16, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@techy4shri
Copy link
Contributor Author

techy4shri commented Apr 16, 2025

@drtechie done and ready for review

@drtechie drtechie merged commit c95b136 into PSMRI:develop Apr 17, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@drtechie drtechie drtechie approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue in Build-on-pull-request GitHub Actions in Inventory-UI

2 participants

@techy4shri @drtechie