Skip to content

Revert "[XPU][CI] xpu add ci test for pd"#5645

Merged
plusNew001 merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
revert-5610-pd_ci_deve
Dec 18, 2025
Merged

Revert "[XPU][CI] xpu add ci test for pd"#5645
plusNew001 merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
revert-5610-pd_ci_deve

Conversation

@plusNew001
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Reverts #5610

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 18, 2025 11:51
@paddle-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

paddle-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Thanks for your contribution!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR reverts a previous change (#5610) by replacing a larger-scale PD separation test with a simpler one. The changes swap out a test for a 300B model with TP4 configuration for a test using a smaller 0.3B model with TP1 configuration, and removes some configuration code from the shared test utilities.

Key changes:

  • Replaces test for ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B model (with wint4 quantization, TP4) with ERNIE-4.5-0.3B model (TP1)
  • Removes 5-second stabilization sleep after health check in start_server
  • Removes dynamic RDMA NIC configuration from setup_ep_env function

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tests/xpu_ci/test_pd_separation.py Adds new PD separation test for smaller 0.3B model with TP1 configuration
tests/xpu_ci/test_pd_300b_tp4.py Removes PD separation test for larger 300B model with TP4 configuration
tests/xpu_ci/conftest.py Removes post-health-check sleep and dynamic RDMA setup from EP environment configuration

@plusNew001 plusNew001 merged commit d739af5 into develop Dec 18, 2025
12 of 16 checks passed
@EmmonsCurse EmmonsCurse deleted the revert-5610-pd_ci_deve branch December 22, 2025 13:55
chang-wenbin pushed a commit to chang-wenbin/FastDeploy that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

contributor External developers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants