[Optimize] optimize mask_quant & swiglu

[fxyfxy777]

Motivation

💡 If this PR is a Cherry Pick, the PR title needs to follow the format by adding the [Cherry-Pick] label at the very beginning and appending the original PR ID at the end. For example, [Cherry-Pick][CI] Add check trigger and logic(#5191)

💡 如若此PR是Cherry Pick，PR标题需遵循格式，在最开始加上[Cherry-Pick]标签，以及最后面加上原PR ID，例如[Cherry-Pick][CI] Add check trigger and logic(#5191)

Modifications

from fastdeploy.model_executor.ops.gpu import group_swiglu_with_masked
from fastdeploy.model_executor.ops.gpu import masked_per_token_quant
融合上述两个算子为fused_mask_swiglu_fp8_quant
去掉了fp16的支持，暂时看没有需要调用的地方
去掉了输入支持int64的场景，同样是没有需求
支持ue8m0的场景
精度：
bd7b915
这个commit中测试了融合后的算子和融合之前的算子逐位对齐的
删去了mask_per_token_quant算子，mask_swiglu算子在别的文件(custom_ops/gpu_ops/moe/moe_ffn.cu ,custom_ops/gpu_ops/moe/moe_expert_ffn_wint2.cu)中有调用，暂时先不删除

性能结论：测试数据：self.group_num = 10
self.group_size = 2048
self.hidden_dim = 7168
self.block_size = 128
每个rank10个专家，有效token数在0-512的范围内，
H 卡替换比：(约1.6倍)

B卡替换比：(约2倍)

Usage or Command

Accuracy Tests

Checklist

• Add at least a tag in the PR title.
  • Tag list: [[FDConfig],[APIServer],[Engine], [Scheduler], [PD Disaggregation], [Executor], [Graph Optimization], [Speculative Decoding], [RL], [Models], [Quantization], [Loader], [OP], [KVCache], [DataProcessor], [BugFix], [Docs], [CI], [Optimization], [Feature], [Benchmark], [Others], [XPU], [HPU], [GCU], [DCU], [Iluvatar], [Metax]]
  • You can add new tags based on the PR content, but the semantics must be clear.
• Format your code, run pre-commit before commit.
• Add unit tests. Please write the reason in this PR if no unit tests.
• Provide accuracy results.
• If the current PR is submitting to the release branch, make sure the PR has been submitted to the develop branch, then cherry-pick it to the release branch with the [Cherry-Pick] PR tag.

[paddle-bot]

Thanks for your contribution!

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (develop@6c685c9). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
..._executor/layers/moe/fused_moe_deepgemm_backend.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #6222   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   67.00%           
==========================================
  Files              ?      385           
  Lines              ?    51283           
  Branches           ?     7998           
==========================================
  Hits               ?    34362           
  Misses             ?    14430           
  Partials           ?     2491           

Flag	Coverage Δ
GPU	67.00% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[fxyfxy777]

/re-run all-failed

[fxyfxy777]

/re-run all-failed

[fxyfxy777]

/re-run all-failed

[K11OntheBoat]

LGTM

[yongqiangma]

LGTM

[fxyfxy777]

/re-run all-failed