Skip to content

[Bug] Review paper workflow #67

@4ndrelim

Description

@4ndrelim

Current review_paper is error-prone and expensive. This is due to diverse project structures and inconsistent sections naming. A more robust way in analyzing project files is in dev.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions