-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
fix: "\%" early stop #160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+32
−2
Merged
fix: "\%" early stop #160
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should cover most cases. Think its fair not to expect multiple chained
\since it hardly serves practical purpose beyond 2 consecutive backslashes which represents newline. 3 consecutive followed by a%would denote newline followed by%which is hardly the intent.But a more general solution that guards against malicious input is to count the number of backslashes preceding
%and only treating the remaining as comment if the count is even. This logic is actually implemented in the xtramcp backend inLatexParsersince it is not uncommon to encounter cases e.g.\\\{. https://github.com/PaperDebugger/xtramcp/blob/main/common/latex_parser.py#L780That said, I personally feel it is reasonable enough and am also ok with this solution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, on a separate note, do you know why are we removing comments before passing to the LLM? I don't know the specifics, but assume this is the case. In general, even if it is a user comment not meant to be displayed, it might serve as good contextual cues or auxiliary information. The output may be informed with user's thoughts in the form of comments.
Might it be because some comments might be too long / redundant? So this is an attempt to save tokens?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@4ndrelim Sure, I can generalise this solution to count odd and even backslashes.
@Junyi-99 Was there more context as to why comments were removed previously?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@4ndrelim Wait actually this already handles 3 or more backslashes before the % as well. I've improved the test cases to cover 3 or more backslashes regardless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, i did not realise it already covers. nice.