Detected endpoint not reported in /endpoints

[dannycohen]

Repro

1. Created a simple SM solution with a sending MVC and receiving host endpoints
2. Sent a message, audited and properly displayed (see image below)
3. However, only the receiving endpoint (Application2.Sales) is shown in Endpoints List (which correctly represents the output of /api/endpoints)
4. The sending MVC endpoint (Application2.ECommerce) is not reported in Endpoints list

Tested with Particular.ServiceControl-1.0.0

// @andreasohlund, @indualagarsamy, @esculli

[dannycohen]

@andreasohlund -
Following our debug session, exported Audit Journal messages in here

[johnsimons]

Is the endpoint missing a SendOnly endpoint?

On Wednesday, 22 January 2014, Danny Cohen notifications@github.com wrote:

Repro

1. Created a simple SM solution with a sending MVC and receiving host
   endpoints
2. Sent a message, audited and properly displayed (see image below)
3. However, only the receiving endpoint (Application2.Sales) is shown
   in Endpoints List (which correctly represents the output of /api/endpoints)
4. The sending MVC endpoint (Application2.ECommerce) is not reported
   in Endpoints list

[image: image]https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/3889023/1971840/3bc937b6-833b-11e3-9fa0-6a538e89f30c.png

Tested with Particular.ServiceControl-1.0.0

// @andreasohlund https://github.com/andreasohlund, @indualagarsamyhttps://github.com/indualagarsamy,
@esculli https://github.com/esculli

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/199
.

[dannycohen]

@johnsimons - It appears not.
For example, see image below: (missing endpoints marked)

[johnsimons]

Ok, I was just guessing what it could be, I'll look into it tomorrow.
Not a showstopper for beta right?

Also does SM installs in vs2013, that is all I have!

On Wednesday, 22 January 2014, Danny Cohen notifications@github.com wrote:

@johnsimons https://github.com/johnsimons - It appears not.
For example, see image below: (missing endpoints marked)

[image: image]https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/3889023/1972166/47a1986e-8343-11e3-9631-4591703fbb9a.png

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/199#issuecomment-33003273
.

[dannycohen]

@andreasohlund is looking at it now.

Not a showstopper for beta right?

Showstopper. The issue is not strictly related to SM.

Currently, no SM in VS2013.

[johnsimons]

@dannycohen after talking to @andreasohlund and @indualagarsamy this may take a bit longer to fix as we currently cannot reproduce it.
This is not a critical issue that should prevent a beta release, so bumping it to v1.
That said, the beta release notes should include this in the know issues section.

[indualagarsamy]

@dannycohen - I cleaned out the data, Ran Service Control. Ran the video store sample, and looking at the endpoints, I see all 5 of the endpoints

[{"id":"VideoStore.CustomerRelations","name":"VideoStore.CustomerRelations","machines":["SELENE"],"endpoint_properties":[{"key":"monitored","value":"true"}]},
{"id":"VideoStore.Sales","name":"VideoStore.Sales","machines":["SELENE"],"endpoint_properties":[{"key":"monitored","value":"true"}]},
{"id":"VideoStore.ECommerce","name":"VideoStore.ECommerce","machines":["SELENE"],"endpoint_properties":[{"key":"monitored","value":"true"}]},
{"id":"VideoStore.ContentManagement","name":"VideoStore.ContentManagement","machines":["SELENE"],"endpoint_properties":[{"key":"monitored","value":"true"}]},
{"id":"VideoStore.Operations","name":"VideoStore.Operations","machines":["SELENE"],"endpoint_properties":[{"key":"monitored","value":"true"}]}]

And I also see it in service insight.

can we take a look at this together?

[johnsimons]

Back in the beta release milestone.

After talking to @dannycohen, it would be embarrassing if the simplest use case when using our platform fails.

[indualagarsamy]

After debugging with @andreasohlund, issue is that the generated code from ServiceMatrix has the forwarding turned on for the UnicastBusConfigSection and the audit feature is also on.
This results in raven concurrency exception in Service Control, while the audit messages are being processed:
So three things:

• ServiceMatrix should not adding forwarding for UnicastBusConfig, instead add AuditConfig
• Should the core prevent double messages in the audit queue if both audit feature is on and forwarding is also set to the same queue.
• When Unicastbus, forwarding is turned on, atleast one audit message should get processed by ServiceControl.
  I'll add separate issues for the above soon!

[dannycohen]

@indualagarsamy / @johnsimons / @andreasohlund - Great, thanks!

@esculli - please note the above findings and fix SM accordingly:

ServiceMatrix should not adding forwarding for UnicastBusConfig, instead add AuditConfig

[andreasohlund]

Milestone changed to 1.0.0