You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🙏 Request:
Please review the changes to ensure that the documentation is clear, accurate, and adheres to your project's standards.
Any feedback regarding areas that might still need clarification or additional details would be highly appreciated.
You can also raise the request on the Penify Community or mail us at support@penify.dev
Description
This PR focuses on enhancing the documentation across various modules in the codebase.
Improved docstrings for functions in cli.py, composer.py, parser.py, and utils.py.
Added detailed explanations of function purposes, parameters, and return values.
Ensured that documentation adheres to project standards for clarity and accuracy.
Changes walkthrough 📝
Relevant files
Documentation
cli.py
Improved documentation for CLI entry point
docstring_parser/cli.py
Enhanced docstring for the main function.
Added details about argument parsing and command handling.
"""Parse a JSDoc string into a structured dictionary.
This function processes a JSDoc string to extract structured information such
as description, parameters, return values, exceptions, examples, and other
tags. It handles the removal of opening and closing markers, splits the content
into lines, and categorizes each line based on whether it is part of a tag or
the main description.
Args:
docstring (str): The JSDoc string to parse.
Returns:
Dict[str, Any]: A dictionary representing the parsed JSDoc structure.
++Raises:+ ValueError: If the input `docstring` is empty or not a string.
"""
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
Why: Adding input validation is crucial for preventing runtime errors and ensuring the function behaves as expected, making this a high-priority suggestion.
9
Add error handling for invalid type_str formats to ensure robustness during parsing
Consider adding error handling for invalid type_str formats to prevent unexpected behavior during parsing.
"""Extract detailed type information from a JSDoc type string.
This function parses the input type string to determine if it represents a
union of types, a generic/template type with parameters, or a simple type. It
returns a dictionary containing the parsed type information.
Args:
type_str (str): The type string from a JSDoc tag.
Returns:
Dict[str, Any]: A dictionary with parsed type information.
- If the type is a union, it includes a 'union' key with a list of types.
- If the type is generic/template, it includes 'name' and 'params' keys.
- If the type is simple, it only includes a 'name' key.
++Raises:+ ValueError: If the input `type_str` is not a valid format.
"""
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
Why: Implementing error handling for invalid formats is essential for robustness and reliability of the function, addressing a significant potential issue.
9
Enhancement
Reintroduce the example section in the docstring to enhance user understanding of the function's usage
The example section in the docstring should be reintroduced to provide users with practical usage scenarios for the function.
"""Compose a JSDoc string from a structured dictionary.
This function constructs a JSDoc comment based on the provided dictionary
structure, handling various components such as descriptions, parameters,
returns, throws, examples, and other tags. It ensures that each section is
correctly formatted and included in the final JSDoc string if present in the
input dictionary.
Args:
jsdoc_obj (Dict[str, Any]): The dictionary representing the JSDoc structure.
Returns:
str: The formatted JSDoc string.
++Example:+ >>> compose_jsdoc({'description': 'Description', 'params': [{'name': 'name', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'The name'}]})+ '/**\\n * Description\\n * @param {string} name - The name\\n */'
"""
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: Reintroducing the example section would significantly enhance user understanding and practical application of the function, making it a valuable addition.
8
Maintainability
Remove unnecessary blank lines before the function definition for better readability
Consider removing the extra blank lines before the function definition to improve code readability and maintain a consistent style.
"""Entry point for the command-line interface.
This function sets up an argument parser to handle different commands (`parse`,
-compose`, and `remove`) related to JSDoc strings. It processes the input data+`compose`, and `remove`) related to JSDoc strings. It processes the input data
based on the specified command, performs the required operations (parsing,
composing, or removing components), and handles errors appropriately. The
results are then output to either a file or standard output.
"""
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
Why: While removing extra blank lines can improve readability, this suggestion does not address a critical issue and is more of a style preference.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
This PR focuses exclusively on updating and refining the documentation throughout the codebase. There are no functional changes to the code itself.
Changes:
🐍 docstring_parser/init.py
🐍 docstring_parser/cli.py
🐍 docstring_parser/composer.py
🐍 docstring_parser/parser.py
🐍 docstring_parser/utils.py
🙏 Request:
Please review the changes to ensure that the documentation is clear, accurate, and adheres to your project's standards.
Any feedback regarding areas that might still need clarification or additional details would be highly appreciated.
You can also raise the request on the Penify Community or mail us at support@penify.dev
Description
This PR focuses on enhancing the documentation across various modules in the codebase.
cli.py,composer.py,parser.py, andutils.py.Changes walkthrough 📝
cli.py
Improved documentation for CLI entry pointdocstring_parser/cli.py
mainfunction.composer.py
Enhanced documentation for JSDoc compositiondocstring_parser/composer.py
compose_jsdocfunction.parser.py
Clarified documentation for JSDoc parsingdocstring_parser/parser.py
parse_jsdocfunction.utils.py
Improved documentation for utility functionsdocstring_parser/utils.py