Skip to content

Conversation

@penify-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@penify-dev penify-dev bot commented May 26, 2025

User description

This PR focuses exclusively on updating and refining the documentation throughout the codebase. There are no functional changes to the code itself.

Changes:
🐍 docstring_parser/init.py
🐍 docstring_parser/cli.py
🐍 docstring_parser/composer.py
🐍 docstring_parser/parser.py
🐍 docstring_parser/utils.py

🙏 Request:
Please review the changes to ensure that the documentation is clear, accurate, and adheres to your project's standards.
Any feedback regarding areas that might still need clarification or additional details would be highly appreciated.
You can also raise the request on the Penify Community or mail us at support@penify.dev


Description

This PR focuses on enhancing the documentation across various modules in the codebase.

  • Improved docstrings for functions in cli.py, composer.py, parser.py, and utils.py.
  • Added detailed explanations of function purposes, parameters, and return values.
  • Ensured that documentation adheres to project standards for clarity and accuracy.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Documentation
cli.py
Improved documentation for CLI entry point                             

docstring_parser/cli.py

  • Enhanced docstring for the main function.
  • Added details about argument parsing and command handling.
  • +8/-1     
    composer.py
    Enhanced documentation for JSDoc composition                         

    docstring_parser/composer.py

  • Expanded docstring for compose_jsdoc function.
  • Included details on handling various JSDoc components.
  • +10/-9   
    parser.py
    Clarified documentation for JSDoc parsing                               

    docstring_parser/parser.py

  • Improved docstring for parse_jsdoc function.
  • Clarified the function's purpose and return structure.
  • +23/-15 
    utils.py
    Improved documentation for utility functions                         

    docstring_parser/utils.py

  • Enhanced docstring for utility functions.
  • Added explanations for type extraction and merging functions.
  • +33/-26 

    💡 Penify usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

    @sumansaurabh sumansaurabh reopened this May 26, 2025
    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 2 labels May 26, 2025
    @penify-dev
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    penify-dev bot commented May 26, 2025

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are primarily focused on documentation updates, which are generally straightforward to review.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    @penify-dev
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    penify-dev bot commented May 26, 2025

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add input validation to ensure the docstring is a non-empty string before processing

    The function should validate the docstring input to ensure it is a non-empty string before
    processing to avoid potential errors.

    docstring_parser/parser.py [9-21]

     """Parse a JSDoc string into a structured dictionary.
     
     This function processes a JSDoc string to extract structured information such
     as description, parameters, return values, exceptions, examples, and other
     tags. It handles the removal of opening and closing markers, splits the content
     into lines, and categorizes each line based on whether it is part of a tag or
     the main description.
     
     Args:
         docstring (str): The JSDoc string to parse.
     
     Returns:
         Dict[str, Any]: A dictionary representing the parsed JSDoc structure.
    +
    +Raises:
    +    ValueError: If the input `docstring` is empty or not a string.
     """
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Adding input validation is crucial for preventing runtime errors and ensuring the function behaves as expected, making this a high-priority suggestion.

    9
    Add error handling for invalid type_str formats to ensure robustness during parsing

    Consider adding error handling for invalid type_str formats to prevent unexpected behavior
    during parsing.

    docstring_parser/utils.py [8-21]

     """Extract detailed type information from a JSDoc type string.
     
     This function parses the input type string to determine if it represents a
     union of types, a generic/template type with parameters, or a simple type. It
     returns a dictionary containing the parsed type information.
     
     Args:
         type_str (str): The type string from a JSDoc tag.
     
     Returns:
         Dict[str, Any]: A dictionary with parsed type information.
             - If the type is a union, it includes a 'union' key with a list of types.
             - If the type is generic/template, it includes 'name' and 'params' keys.
             - If the type is simple, it only includes a 'name' key.
    +
    +Raises:
    +    ValueError: If the input `type_str` is not a valid format.
     """
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Implementing error handling for invalid formats is essential for robustness and reliability of the function, addressing a significant potential issue.

    9
    Enhancement
    Reintroduce the example section in the docstring to enhance user understanding of the function's usage

    The example section in the docstring should be reintroduced to provide users with
    practical usage scenarios for the function.

    docstring_parser/composer.py [7-20]

     """Compose a JSDoc string from a structured dictionary.
     
     This function constructs a JSDoc comment based on the provided dictionary
     structure, handling various components such as descriptions, parameters,
     returns, throws, examples, and other tags. It ensures that each section is
     correctly formatted and included in the final JSDoc string if present in the
     input dictionary.
     
     Args:
         jsdoc_obj (Dict[str, Any]): The dictionary representing the JSDoc structure.
     
     Returns:
         str: The formatted JSDoc string.
    +
    +Example:
    +    >>> compose_jsdoc({'description': 'Description', 'params': [{'name': 'name', 'type': 'string', 'description': 'The name'}]})
    +    '/**\\n * Description\\n * @param {string} name - The name\\n */'
     """
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Reintroducing the example section would significantly enhance user understanding and practical application of the function, making it a valuable addition.

    8
    Maintainability
    Remove unnecessary blank lines before the function definition for better readability

    Consider removing the extra blank lines before the function definition to improve code
    readability and maintain a consistent style.

    docstring_parser/cli.py [17-24]

     """Entry point for the command-line interface.
     
     This function sets up an argument parser to handle different commands (`parse`,
    -compose`, and `remove`) related to JSDoc strings. It processes the input data
    +`compose`, and `remove`) related to JSDoc strings. It processes the input data
     based on the specified command, performs the required operations (parsing,
     composing, or removing components), and handles errors appropriately. The
     results are then output to either a file or standard output.
     """
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While removing extra blank lines can improve readability, this suggestion does not address a critical issue and is more of a style preference.

    5

    @sumansaurabh sumansaurabh merged commit c85cf60 into main May 26, 2025
    @sumansaurabh sumansaurabh deleted the penify/auto_doc_61bb1ce_3b506 branch May 26, 2025 01:33
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Labels

    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 2

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants