Skip to content

Conversation

@demerphq
Copy link
Collaborator

Remove experimental status for lookbehind. This patch should not be applied until #19442 is merged.

Thanks to Karl Williamson for doing the bulk of the work to make this
successful. The regex engine is the better for it.
@hvds
Copy link
Contributor

hvds commented Feb 26, 2022

As I noted elsewhere, I'm not convinced this has had the level of testing out there to justify marking it non-experimental. However I'm unclear on what the criteria really are for that decision, I've no problem with others deciding differently.

The alternative of reducing the scope sounds more attractive to me, I'll try to look at that.

@hvds
Copy link
Contributor

hvds commented Mar 3, 2022

@demerphq is it safe to assume this PR should be closed now, since the alternative to reduce scope of the experimental status has been merged?

@demerphq
Copy link
Collaborator Author

demerphq commented Mar 3, 2022 via email

@demerphq
Copy link
Collaborator Author

demerphq commented Feb 8, 2023

I am closing this. The existing documentation is good enough I think. If we want to remove its experimental status we probably have to come up with a new experiment category, and this PR does not do that.

@demerphq demerphq closed this Feb 8, 2023
@demerphq demerphq deleted the yves/lb_de_exp branch February 8, 2023 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants