Skip to content

Required Changes for MuJoCo 3.6.0 Upgrade#574

Merged
JWhitleyWork merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
mujoco-3_6_0
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

Required Changes for MuJoCo 3.6.0 Upgrade#574
JWhitleyWork merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
mujoco-3_6_0

Conversation

@JWhitleyWork
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@JWhitleyWork JWhitleyWork commented Apr 15, 2026

Upgrading from MuJoCo 3.2.7 to 3.6.0 exposes some bugs in our configs because validation checks weren't previously being run on qpos values or the <replicate> tag. Claude tells me it's not possible to use the <replicate> tag in the way it was being used in hangar_sim and still pass those checks which is why the values have to be broken out individually. These changes should be backward-compatible.

Companion to PickNikRobotics/moveit_pro#18077.

JWhitleyWork and others added 2 commits April 14, 2026 17:28
…lity

MuJoCo 3.6.0 re-enabled keyframe qpos validation during replicate
processing, causing hangar_sim to crash on startup. Replace the two
<replicate> elements for lidar sites and their rangefinder sensors
with manually expanded equivalents.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@JWhitleyWork JWhitleyWork self-assigned this Apr 15, 2026
@JWhitleyWork JWhitleyWork requested a review from nbbrooks April 15, 2026 21:16
@JWhitleyWork JWhitleyWork enabled auto-merge April 15, 2026 21:38
@bkanator bkanator self-requested a review April 16, 2026 15:57
@bkanator
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bkanator commented Apr 16, 2026

  • - lab_sim
  • - hangar_sim
  • - grinding_sim
  • - space_satellite_sim
  • - factory_sim
  • - mock_sim
  • - kitchen_sim
  • - dual_arm_sim

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bkanator bkanator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

confirmed all the things move in the sims

@JWhitleyWork JWhitleyWork merged commit eaede54 into main Apr 16, 2026
5 checks passed
@JWhitleyWork JWhitleyWork deleted the mujoco-3_6_0 branch April 16, 2026 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants