Pipedrive - fix app name

[andrewjschuang]

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Internal naming updates within the Pipedrive “Add Deal” action for improved clarity and consistency. No changes to behavior, configuration, or user experience.
• Chores
  • Version bumps for the Pipedrive component and the “Add Deal” action to reflect internal maintenance. No functional impact.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs	Ignored			Sep 15, 2025 7:09pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit	Ignored			Sep 15, 2025 7:09pm

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The Add Deal action in Pipedrive was updated to rename the internal app reference from app to pipedriveApp across imports, props, and API calls, and its version was incremented from 0.1.14 to 0.1.15. The Pipedrive component package.json version was bumped from 0.10.1 to 0.10.2.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Add Deal action refactor components/pipedrive/actions/add-deal/add-deal.mjs	Renamed internal import and references from app to pipedriveApp; updated propDefinitions, run destructuring, and API calls (addDeal, addNote); bumped action version 0.1.14 → 0.1.15; no exported API changes.
Package version bump components/pipedrive/package.json	Incremented package version 0.10.1 → 0.10.2; no other changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

In burrows of code where carrots compile,
I nudge a name, hop line by line with a smile.
Version ticks forward—thump, thump—what a leap!
Deals still bloom; promises keep.
With whiskered finesse and a changelog tune,
I ship this patch beneath the moon. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description contains only the template placeholder "## WHY" with no explanation, so it omits rationale, scope, testing, and verification details required by the repository template; the raw_summary shows the actual changes but that information is not present in the PR description for reviewers. Because the description lacks necessary context and verification steps, it does not meet the repository's description requirements and is insufficient for review.	Please complete the "## WHY" section with the rationale for renaming the internal import to pipedriveApp, any behavioral or compatibility impacts, and the verification steps or tests performed so reviewers can reproduce and validate the change. Also state release/migration notes for the package version bump and link any related issues or tickets; if this is purely a rename with no functional change, state that explicitly.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "Pipedrive - fix app name" is concise and accurately reflects the primary change in the diff (renaming the internal App import to pipedriveApp and related updates), avoids noise or file lists, and clearly signals intent to a reviewer scanning history. It is short, specific, and directly related to the changeset. Therefore it aligns with the repository's title guidance.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch pipedrive-fix-app-name

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

• Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
• Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

components/pipedrive/actions/add-deal/add-deal.mjs (1)

149-149: Avoid shadowing the imported symbol (optional).

Destructuring pipedriveApp into a local with the same name as the import can confuse readers. Either use this.pipedriveApp directly, or alias to app as shown in the fallback snippet above.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between db51506 and 38092c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• components/pipedrive/actions/add-deal/add-deal.mjs (4 hunks)
• components/pipedrive/package.json (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

components/pipedrive/actions/add-deal/add-deal.mjs (8)

components/pipedrive/actions/add-note/add-note.mjs (1)

• resp (89-102)

components/pipedrive/actions/add-activity/add-activity.mjs (1)

• resp (173-192)

components/pipedrive/actions/add-organization/add-organization.mjs (1)

• resp (35-39)

components/pipedrive/actions/add-person/add-person.mjs (1)

• resp (55-63)

components/pipedrive/actions/get-person-details/get-person-details.mjs (1)

• resp (23-23)

components/pipedrive/actions/search-persons/search-persons.mjs (1)

• resp (61-70)

components/pipedrive/actions/update-deal/update-deal.mjs (1)

• resp (103-117)

components/pipedrive/actions/update-person/update-person.mjs (1)

• resp (64-73)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: pnpm publish
• GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
• GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
• GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components

🔇 Additional comments (6)

components/pipedrive/package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump aligns with action changes — LGTM.

Package version 0.10.2 is consistent with the action bump; no other diffs.

components/pipedrive/actions/add-deal/add-deal.mjs (5)

2-2: Import renamed to pipedriveApp — LGTM.

Matches naming used across other Pipedrive actions.

---

9-9: Action version bump to 0.1.15 — LGTM.

Patch-level change appropriate for internal renaming.

---

175-197: API calls updated to use pipedriveApp — LGTM.

If you adopt the app alias/fallback, update these calls accordingly (see diff above).

Also applies to: 200-203

---

15-17: PropDefinitions correctly switched to pipedriveApp — LGTM.

Searched components/pipedrive/actions (including add-deal.mjs); all propDefinition entries and runtime usages reference pipedriveApp / this.pipedriveApp — no 'app' prop or this.app occurrences remain.

---

12-12: No breaking change detected - prop renaming is a standard refactoring pattern.

After verification, the concern about breaking changes is incorrect. The code shows consistent usage patterns across all Pipedrive actions:

1. All actions import the app as pipedriveApp and declare it as a prop with the same name
2. The add-lead action uses pipedrive as both import name and prop name, showing this is normal variation
3. All actions access the app instance via this.pipedriveApp (or this.pipedrive in add-lead)
4. The app methods addDeal() and addNote() are confirmed to exist in the base app

This is standard component refactoring where the prop name matches the imported identifier. No backward compatibility issues exist since prop names are internal to the component implementation.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.