Skip to content

Conversation

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao commented Dec 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Resolved property reference naming inconsistencies across multiple profile-related operations including profile connection, direct messaging, and lead management.
    • Corrected profile property identifiers for improved data consistency and reliable integration with profile handling systems.
    • Updated profile action component versions and package version to reflect these critical corrections and stability improvements across the platform.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs Ignored Ignored Dec 3, 2025 5:47pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit Ignored Ignored Dec 3, 2025 5:47pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The PR fixes a property naming inconsistency across three actions in the dux_soup component, changing targetProfileURL to targetProfileUrl for consistent camelCase naming. All affected action versions are bumped from 0.0.2 to 0.0.3, and the package version is updated from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Action property reference corrections
components/dux_soup/actions/connect-profile/connect-profile.mjs,
components/dux_soup/actions/message-profile/message-profile.mjs,
components/dux_soup/actions/save-profile-lead/save-profile-lead.mjs
Fixed property reference from this.targetProfileURL to this.targetProfileUrl in request payloads and summary messages for consistent camelCase naming; version bumped 0.0.2 → 0.0.3 in each file
Package metadata
components/dux_soup/package.json
Version updated from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • All three action files apply the same homogeneous fix (property name correction)
  • Changes are straightforward property reference updates with consistent patterns
  • Version bumps are routine administrative updates

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description is missing entirely. The template requires a WHY section explaining the rationale for these changes. Add a description explaining why these property name changes are necessary (e.g., standardizing naming conventions, fixing bugs, API updates) in the WHY section.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main changes: fixing property name inconsistencies (targetProfileURL → targetProfileUrl) across multiple DuxSoup action files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch duxsoup-fix

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6512c92 and 342b014.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • components/dux_soup/actions/connect-profile/connect-profile.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/dux_soup/actions/message-profile/message-profile.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/dux_soup/actions/save-profile-lead/save-profile-lead.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/dux_soup/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/dux_soup/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Appropriate version bump for bug fix.

The patch version bump from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 is appropriate for fixing the property naming inconsistency across the DuxSoup actions.

components/dux_soup/actions/message-profile/message-profile.mjs (2)

7-7: LGTM! Appropriate version bump.

The patch version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.0.3 correctly reflects the bug fix.


35-35: LGTM! Property reference now matches definition.

The fix correctly changes this.targetProfileURL to this.targetProfileUrl, aligning with the property definition on lines 16-21. No remaining references to the incorrect targetProfileURL exist in the dux_soup component.

components/dux_soup/actions/connect-profile/connect-profile.mjs (2)

7-7: LGTM! Appropriate version bump.

The patch version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.0.3 correctly reflects the bug fix.


29-29: LGTM! Property reference corrected.

The fix correctly changes this.targetProfileURL to this.targetProfileUrl, matching the property definition on lines 16-21.

components/dux_soup/actions/save-profile-lead/save-profile-lead.mjs (2)

7-7: LGTM! Appropriate version bump.

The patch version bump from 0.0.2 to 0.0.3 correctly reflects the bug fix.


29-29: LGTM! Property reference corrected.

The fix correctly changes this.targetProfileURL to this.targetProfileUrl, matching the property definition on lines 16-21.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jcortes jcortes moved this from Ready for PR Review to Ready for Release in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 3, 2025
@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit 9e8564b into master Dec 4, 2025
10 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the duxsoup-fix branch December 4, 2025 20:54
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready for Release to Done in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants