Skip to content

Feature/pipelex get instance#85

Merged
lchoquel merged 6 commits intodevfrom
feature/Pipelex-get_instance
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Feature/pipelex get instance#85
lchoquel merged 6 commits intodevfrom
feature/Pipelex-get_instance

Conversation

@lchoquel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

📝 Description

  • Make it safer and more tolerant to add domains from toml
  • Pipelex.get_instance()

🔄 Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • ✨ New feature
  • 💥 Breaking change
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • ✅ Test update

@lchoquel lchoquel requested a review from thomashebrard June 13, 2025 23:05
Comment thread pipelex/core/domain_library.py
thomashebrard
thomashebrard previously approved these changes Jun 14, 2025
lchoquel added 3 commits June 14, 2025 10:28
…ntain too many bytes.

Made Stuff a CustomBaseModel so that it applies to logging and pretty_printing Stuff.
Defined FORCE_DRY_RUN_MODE_ENV_KEY = "PIPELEX_FORCE_DRY_RUN_MODE".
@lchoquel lchoquel merged commit f0f9e52 into dev Jun 16, 2025
13 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 16, 2025
@lchoquel lchoquel deleted the feature/Pipelex-get_instance branch June 16, 2025 06:41
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants