Skip to content

docs: proposal 122 — deduplicate levers architecture and improvements#377

Merged
neoneye merged 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/proposal-122-deduplicate-levers
Mar 21, 2026
Merged

docs: proposal 122 — deduplicate levers architecture and improvements#377
neoneye merged 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/proposal-122-deduplicate-levers

Conversation

@neoneye
Copy link
Member

@neoneye neoneye commented Mar 21, 2026

Summary

Documents the deduplicate_levers iteration journey (9 iterations, 5 PRs) and proposes future improvement directions.

Combines:

  • Iteration history and lessons learned (what worked, what failed, why)
  • Structural analysis of current issues (fused dedup/prioritization, no absorption structure, retention bias, no survivor-overlap validation)
  • Four improvement options with effort/risk assessment

Improvement options

  • Option A (incremental): absorbed_into field, remove_reason, survivor-overlap validation, observability fixes
  • Option B (two-pass): separate dedup from prioritization into distinct LLM calls
  • Option C (cluster-based): group similar levers, pick representatives per cluster
  • Option D (mechanism-based): decompose levers into actor/mechanism/effect before deduplicating

Recommendation

Near-term: Option A items 1-2 and 5 (absorption metadata + observability). Medium-term: survivor-overlap validation + repair pass. Long-term: evaluate two-pass or cluster-based if incremental improvements plateau.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Combines iteration journey (9 iterations, 5 PRs), structural analysis
of current issues, and four improvement options (incremental, two-pass,
cluster-based, mechanism-based) with prioritized recommendations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@neoneye neoneye merged commit b91b9f2 into main Mar 21, 2026
3 checks passed
@neoneye neoneye deleted the docs/proposal-122-deduplicate-levers branch March 21, 2026 02:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant