Skip to content

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 204: Server-side request forgery#129

Merged
breadddevv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
alert-autofix-204
Apr 18, 2026
Merged

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 204: Server-side request forgery#129
breadddevv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
alert-autofix-204

Conversation

@breadddevv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Potential fix for https://github.com/PlanetaryOrbit/orbit/security/code-scanning/204

General fix: do not use raw router.query values directly in request URLs. Normalize and strictly validate the route parameter, and only use it if it matches an expected safe format; otherwise fall back to a trusted value or block the action.

Best fix here (without changing intended behavior): in components/profile/notices.tsx, sanitize router.query.id before building the URL. Since router.query.id can be string | string[] | undefined, first coerce to a single string, then validate with a strict allowlist regex (for example alphanumeric, _, -, length-bounded). Use the sanitized value if valid, otherwise use workspace.groupId (trusted state) and safely encode the final segment with encodeURIComponent when interpolating into the URL.

Changes needed in this file:

  • In the revoke button onClick block around lines 310–311:
    • Replace direct assignment from router.query.id ?? workspace.groupId with validated coercion logic.
    • Build URL with encoded safeWorkspaceId.

No new imports are required.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…rgery

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 18, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@breadddevv has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 52 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 52 minutes and 51 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 25e4c1dd-68b5-46cc-8110-45684edb75f6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5e7608 and 001567b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/profile/notices.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch alert-autofix-204

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@breadddevv breadddevv marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2026 19:21
@breadddevv breadddevv merged commit bb25087 into main Apr 18, 2026
4 checks passed
@breadddevv breadddevv deleted the alert-autofix-204 branch April 18, 2026 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant