Conversation
- Creates file pubs_list.rst listing publications which use DESC (up to 9/8/25) - Adds pubs_list.rst to the table of contents for documentation Resolves PlasmaControl#1838
Memory benchmark result| Test Name | %Δ | Master (MB) | PR (MB) | Δ (MB) | Time PR (s) | Time Master (s) |
| -------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------ | ------------------ | ------------------ |
test_objective_jac_w7x | 7.06 % | 3.782e+03 | 4.049e+03 | 266.94 | 34.35 | 31.12 |
test_proximal_jac_w7x_with_eq_update | 0.99 % | 6.794e+03 | 6.861e+03 | 67.33 | 159.40 | 158.11 |
test_proximal_freeb_jac | 0.24 % | 1.318e+04 | 1.321e+04 | 31.29 | 78.23 | 77.22 |
test_proximal_freeb_jac_blocked | 0.57 % | 7.603e+03 | 7.647e+03 | 43.70 | 70.31 | 68.38 |
test_proximal_freeb_jac_batched | -0.07 % | 7.560e+03 | 7.555e+03 | -5.54 | 71.21 | 68.58 |
test_proximal_jac_ripple | -1.53 % | 7.647e+03 | 7.530e+03 | -117.07 | 69.81 | 68.91 |
test_proximal_jac_ripple_spline | -1.50 % | 3.498e+03 | 3.445e+03 | -52.59 | 71.12 | 72.73 |
test_eq_solve | 0.38 % | 2.050e+03 | 2.058e+03 | 7.78 | 124.15 | 124.37 |For the memory plots, go to the summary of |
|
Thanks for doing this, Jaydeep! |
Yes, will do! I'll check to see if there are other papers I've missed. |
- Creates file pubs_list.rst listing publications which use DESC (up to 9/8/25) - Adds pubs_list.rst to the table of contents for documentation Resolves PlasmaControl#1838
# Conflicts: # docs/pubs_list.rst
dpanici
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
couple more:
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article/32/4/043906/3344075/Verification-of-the-Shafranov-shift-in-free
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada56a
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada56d
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada56c
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6587/adf6e1
There are maybe a couple more which cite DESC but these are ones which cite and talk about it a bit or use it for the analysis in the paper. I could be missing some but these are the last I remember
|
Did the Type One paper actually use DESC? Also, I think it would be even better if we can put a link to the publication list in README.rst and/or the docs. |
|
Agree about adding the list to the readme, maybe just as a direct Also wondering if we want to split the list into "papers about desc" ie ones by us that describe new features being added, vs "papers that use desc" to get other results but don't really add anything new to the code. papers about desc, numbered from the existing list: 1, 3-10, 12, 13, 15, 19 |
-Adds additional papers -Standardizes the formatting for names, using et al. if >10 authors.
Divides list into papers which extend DESC, and those which apply it without significant additions to the code.
Changing from "list" format to "citations"
Adds a link to the relevant page in the docs
dpanici
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
read the docs seems to be failing?
|
Hmm...I think the list formatting was causing an error. Will see if this works. |
|
FYI, sometimes debugging the docs build locally is faster (you don't wait for the runner to pick up, etc). You can follow https://github.com/PlasmaControl/DESC/tree/master/docs#readme to build docs locally. |
|
Oh makes sense, thanks! |
- Creates file pubs_list.rst listing publications which use DESC (up to 9/8/25) - Adds pubs_list.rst to the table of contents in index.rst Resolves PlasmaControl#1838 --------- Co-authored-by: Yigit Gunsur Elmacioglu <102380275+YigitElma@users.noreply.github.com>
Resolves #1838