Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade werkzeug from 2.2.3 to 3.1.4#9

Open
Poghappy wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-9c266a8b138d6f7e8db5943a84d38664
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade werkzeug from 2.2.3 to 3.1.4#9
Poghappy wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-9c266a8b138d6f7e8db5943a84d38664

Conversation

@Poghappy
Copy link
Owner

@Poghappy Poghappy commented Dec 2, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • src/fall_detection/src/requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
Flask 2.2.5 requires Werkzeug, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 2, 2025 23:40
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-9c266a8b138d6f7e8db5943a84d38664

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades Werkzeug from version 2.2.3 to >=3.1.4 to fix a security vulnerability (SNYK-PYTHON-WERKZEUG-14151620). However, the upgrade introduces a critical compatibility issue that needs to be addressed before merging.

Key Changes:

  • Added explicit werkzeug>=3.1.4 dependency to fix security vulnerability
  • Preserved existing flask (unpinned) and tqdm==4.64.0 dependencies

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
flask
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The flask dependency should be pinned to a specific version or version range for reproducible builds and to ensure compatibility with other dependencies. Consider specifying a minimum version, e.g., flask>=3.0.0 (if upgrading to work with Werkzeug 3.x) or flask>=2.2.0,<3.0.0 (if staying on Flask 2.x with a compatible Werkzeug version).

Suggested change
flask
flask>=3.0.0

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants