Calibration enhancements - Group weighting#29
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #30
Summary
This PR enhances the calibration module with group-wise loss averaging and improved training output for better interpretability.
Key Changes
Group-wise Loss Averaging: Added support for balancing loss contributions from targets with different cardinalities. This is particularly useful when calibrating with mixed targets like:
The new
target_groupsparameter ensures each group contributes equally to the loss, preventing high-cardinality groups from dominating the optimization.Improved Training Output: Enhanced verbose output to show:
Simplified Active Weight Detection: Removed the threshold parameter from
get_active_weights()- now simply checks for weights > 0.Example Usage
Test Coverage
Output Example
Before:
After:
The new output format is more intuitive and directly shows the calibration quality as percentages.