Move deletion flag to edge id

[ljeub-pometry]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Move deletion flag to the edge id to make it easier to handle when writing to disk

Why are the changes needed?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? If yes is this documented?

How was this patch tested?

Are there any further changes required?

[github-actions]

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Rust Benchmark'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 2.

Benchmark suite	Current: 30a09f6	Previous: 9823ef7	Ratio
lotr_graph/num_edges	4 ns/iter (± 0)	0 ns/iter (± 0)	+∞
lotr_graph/num_nodes	4 ns/iter (± 0)	1 ns/iter (± 0)	4
lotr_graph/has_node_nonexisting	5 ns/iter (± 0)	2 ns/iter (± 0)	2.50
lotr_graph/iterate_exploded_edges	619695 ns/iter (± 25222)	285473 ns/iter (± 2920)	2.17
lotr_graph/graph_latest	3 ns/iter (± 0)	0 ns/iter (± 0)	+∞
lotr_graph_materialise/materialize	7871294 ns/iter (± 19599)	1564816 ns/iter (± 35303)	5.03
lotr_graph_window_100/num_nodes	14 ns/iter (± 0)	5 ns/iter (± 0)	2.80
lotr_graph_window_100/iterate_exploded_edges	866799 ns/iter (± 2732)	325242 ns/iter (± 847)	2.67
lotr_graph_window_100_materialise/materialize	8359010 ns/iter (± 45179)	1669150 ns/iter (± 10700)	5.01
lotr_graph_window_10/has_node_existing	154 ns/iter (± 11)	62 ns/iter (± 11)	2.48
lotr_graph_window_10/iterate nodes	35285 ns/iter (± 94)	11339 ns/iter (± 40)	3.11
lotr_graph_window_10/iterate edges	103894 ns/iter (± 197)	48684 ns/iter (± 211)	2.13
lotr_graph_window_10/iterate_exploded_edges	411181 ns/iter (± 1023)	155788 ns/iter (± 1001)	2.64
lotr_graph_window_10_materialise/materialize	3675946 ns/iter (± 25648)	971980 ns/iter (± 4278)	3.78
lotr_graph_subgraph_10pc/has_node_nonexisting	5 ns/iter (± 0)	2 ns/iter (± 0)	2.50
lotr_graph_subgraph_10pc_materialise/materialize	1665478 ns/iter (± 28020)	334634 ns/iter (± 1287)	4.98
lotr_graph_subgraph_10pc_windowed/has_node_existing	160 ns/iter (± 9)	62 ns/iter (± 14)	2.58
lotr_graph_subgraph_10pc_windowed/iterate nodes	5612 ns/iter (± 123)	1365 ns/iter (± 3)	4.11
lotr_graph_subgraph_10pc_windowed_materialise/materialize	1021689 ns/iter (± 12702)	230399 ns/iter (± 2617)	4.43
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/num_edges	78424 ns/iter (± 888)	38714 ns/iter (± 1017)	2.03
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/num_edges_temporal	163286 ns/iter (± 3268)	70121 ns/iter (± 7586)	2.33
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/has_node_existing	473 ns/iter (± 22)	129 ns/iter (± 12)	3.67
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/has_node_nonexisting	5 ns/iter (± 0)	2 ns/iter (± 0)	2.50
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/iterate nodes	82816 ns/iter (± 196)	19308 ns/iter (± 47)	4.29
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/iterate edges	215251 ns/iter (± 610)	83616 ns/iter (± 1318)	2.57
lotr_graph_window_50_layered/graph_latest	82422 ns/iter (± 1168)	36649 ns/iter (± 916)	2.25
lotr_graph_window_50_layered_materialise/materialize	34027696 ns/iter (± 229134)	3488825 ns/iter (± 24948)	9.75
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/num_edges_temporal	671244 ns/iter (± 6371)	192686 ns/iter (± 1569)	3.48
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/has_node_existing	507 ns/iter (± 383)	174 ns/iter (± 83)	2.91
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/has_node_nonexisting	5 ns/iter (± 0)	2 ns/iter (± 0)	2.50
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/iterate nodes	110443 ns/iter (± 161)	35886 ns/iter (± 191)	3.08
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/iterate edges	190602 ns/iter (± 562)	84161 ns/iter (± 596)	2.26
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/iterate_exploded_edges	4800183 ns/iter (± 15483)	1659940 ns/iter (± 19402)	2.89
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered/graph_latest	119369 ns/iter (± 1133)	57549 ns/iter (± 4809)	2.07
lotr_graph_persistent_window_50_layered_materialise/materialize	60320476 ns/iter (± 75002)	5298035 ns/iter (± 147912)	11.39
lotr_graph/proto_encode	9547439 ns/iter (± 38425)	1157897 ns/iter (± 73709)	8.25

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

[fabianmurariu]

LGTM