Merged
Conversation
…-sandbox-labels-2026-02-01 merge in main
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add default
sandbox_labelsto the rlm-secrets environment.Type of Change
Testing
uv run pytestlocally.Checklist
Note
Low Risk
Low risk: small, localized change to environment construction that only affects sandbox labeling and adds input validation; main behavior is unchanged unless callers passed invalid
sandbox_labels.Overview
The
rlm-secretsenvironment now always adds a default"rlm-secrets"entry tosandbox_labels, validates that any providedsandbox_labelsislist[str], and deduplicates labels before passing them intoRLMSecretsEnv.Bumps the package version to
0.1.1and documents the change in the README changelog.Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9dcf7c3. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.