Skip to content

add default sandbox_labels to rlm-secrets#810

Merged
snimu merged 4 commits intomainfrom
sebastian/rlm-secrets-sandbox-labels-2026-02-01
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

add default sandbox_labels to rlm-secrets#810
snimu merged 4 commits intomainfrom
sebastian/rlm-secrets-sandbox-labels-2026-02-01

Conversation

@snimu
Copy link
Contributor

@snimu snimu commented Feb 1, 2026

Description

Add default sandbox_labels to the rlm-secrets environment.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Test improvement

Testing

  • All existing tests pass when running uv run pytest locally.
  • New tests have been added to cover the changes

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project as outlined in AGENTS.md
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Note

Low Risk
Low risk: small, localized change to environment construction that only affects sandbox labeling and adds input validation; main behavior is unchanged unless callers passed invalid sandbox_labels.

Overview
The rlm-secrets environment now always adds a default "rlm-secrets" entry to sandbox_labels, validates that any provided sandbox_labels is list[str], and deduplicates labels before passing them into RLMSecretsEnv.

Bumps the package version to 0.1.1 and documents the change in the README changelog.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9dcf7c3. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@snimu snimu merged commit dfc473c into main Feb 2, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant