feat: implement features for the new hub

[Nightknight3000]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Corrected API endpoint path construction for storage write operations when using local data providers, improving request reliability.
  • Enabled progress tracking in streamed logs to provide real-time visibility into operation progress and completion status.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

Pull request was closed or merged during review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fbe7069f-b968-48c1-8ddb-ffd0a5ff543c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59699d4 and 5ff6530.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• flamesdk/resources/client_apis/clients/po_client.py
• flamesdk/resources/client_apis/clients/storage_client.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two client API files were modified with minor payload and path construction updates. The PO client now includes the progress field in stream_logs payloads. The storage client adjusted request path construction by removing a trailing slash and modifying local DP path appending.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
PO Client Progress Field flamesdk/resources/client_apis/clients/po_client.py	Uncommented and enabled the progress field in the stream_logs payload to include it in the POST body.
Storage Client Path Construction flamesdk/resources/client_apis/clients/storage_client.py	Updated request_path in push_result: changed base path from /{type}/ to /{type} and modified local DP appending from localdp to /localdp.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 Progress fields now shine so bright,
Paths adjusted left and right,
No trailing slashes in the way,
Small tweaks to make the APIs play! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't convey the specific changes made in the PR.	Revise the title to be more specific about the actual changes, such as 'fix: include progress field in stream_logs and correct request paths in storage_client'.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch new_hub

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Tip

You can customize the high-level summary generated by CodeRabbit.

Configure the reviews.high_level_summary_instructions setting to provide custom instructions for generating the high-level summary.