Skip to content

Conversation

@fagubla
Copy link
Contributor

@fagubla fagubla commented May 25, 2023

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Download the data showed in the table

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-8227

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@fagubla fagubla requested a review from pmPaulis May 25, 2023 18:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added the codeball:approved Codeball label May 25, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codeball: LGTM! 👍

confidence: 0.97 | [dashboard]

@pmPaulis pmPaulis merged commit fafaa23 into feature/FOUR-8121 May 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants