Skip to content

FOUR-8242 #4821

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
pmPaulis merged 9 commits into from
May 31, 2023
Merged

FOUR-8242 #4821

pmPaulis merged 9 commits into from
May 31, 2023

Conversation

@luNunezProcessmaker
Copy link
Contributor

@luNunezProcessmaker luNunezProcessmaker commented May 25, 2023 •
edited by paulosakamoto
Loading

Issue & Reproduction Steps

FOUR-8242

Solution

N/A

How to Test

Describe how to test that this solution works.

Related Tickets & Packages

- Link to any related FOUR tickets, PRDs, or packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

.

@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 25, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis self-requested a review May 26, 2023 12:54
@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 26, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 26, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

pmPaulis
pmPaulis requested changes May 29, 2023
View reviewed changes
@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 29, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title Feature/four 8242 FOUR-8242 May 30, 2023
@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 30, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

3 similar comments
@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 30, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 30, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 30, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

pmPaulis
pmPaulis requested changes May 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 31, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

pmPaulis
pmPaulis requested changes May 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
@pmkerberos
Copy link

pmkerberos commented May 31, 2023

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-e050779d0e.eng.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis merged commit 0335d7b into feature/FOUR-8121 May 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pmPaulis pmPaulis pmPaulis approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

codeball:needs-review Codeball

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@luNunezProcessmaker @pmkerberos @pmPaulis