Skip to content

FOUR-9413 Run reassign process with default engine#5022

Merged
ryancooley merged 1 commit into
developfrom
FOUR-9413
Jul 19, 2023
Merged

FOUR-9413 Run reassign process with default engine#5022
ryancooley merged 1 commit into
developfrom
FOUR-9413

Conversation

@caleeli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@caleeli caleeli commented Jul 19, 2023

Issue & Reproduction Steps

During the tests of logs. An error happens when a task is reassigned.

Solution

  • The internal process reassign user is synchronous an should be executed by the default engine (without kafka).

How to Test

  • Create a process with a form task (see the attached process as example)
  • Enable reassign task
  • Run the process
  • Reassign the task

Attached: process
logs_in_requests.zip

image

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@caleeli caleeli requested a review from pmPaulis July 19, 2023 18:21
@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@caleeli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

caleeli commented Jul 19, 2023

The registered log:
image

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit d24ec60 into develop Jul 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants