Added Missing Imports in fine_tuning

[Girish-Gaurav-Sharma]

Summary

handle_openai_error was not imported but was used in route of fine_tuning.py

Checklist

Before submitting a pull request, please ensure that you mark these task.

• Ran fastapi run --reload app/main.py or docker compose up in the repository root and test.
• If you've fixed a bug or added code that is tested and has test cases.

Notes

Please add here if any other information is required for the reviewer.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Internal code organization and import restructuring for improved maintainability. No changes to user-facing functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The change reorganizes the import statement in fine_tuning.py by converting a single-line import block into a multi-line format and adding handle_openai_error to the imported utilities from app.utils, along with minor formatting adjustments.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Import reorganization backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py	Added handle_openai_error to public imports from app.utils; converted to multi-line import block; retained get_openai_client, mask_string, load_description, APIResponse; removed empty line before logger

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Imports realigned with care,
New error handler placed with flair,
Multi-line blocks now stand so neat,
One small change, the code's complete! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "Added Missing Imports in fine_tuning" directly and clearly describes the main change in the changeset. The raw summary confirms that handle_openai_error was added to the imports in backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py, which aligns perfectly with the title. The title is concise (5 words), specific to the file being changed, and conveys the primary purpose of the PR without vague or generic language. A developer reviewing commit history would immediately understand that this PR addresses a missing import issue in the fine_tuning module.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b7b640 and df45fe1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (2)

**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Use type hints in Python code (Python 3.11+ project)

Files:

• backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py

backend/app/api/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Expose FastAPI REST endpoints under backend/app/api/ organized by domain

Files:

• backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py (1)

backend/app/utils.py (4)

• get_openai_client (175-205)
• mask_string (163-172)
• load_description (248-253)
• APIResponse (29-53)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

backend/app/api/routes/fine_tuning.py (1)

22-28: LGTM! Critical bug fix correctly implemented.

The addition of handle_openai_error to the imports resolves the missing import issue. This function is used at lines 100, 129, and 305 to handle OpenAI API errors, and without this import, the code would fail with a NameError at runtime. The multi-line import format also improves readability.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!