Skip to content

Conversation

@kcooney
Copy link
Contributor

@kcooney kcooney commented Nov 7, 2025

This is a proposed extension point for the problem that motivated the changes in #93.

@kcooney kcooney force-pushed the kcooney/is-valid-setpoint branch 3 times, most recently from e0f23ef to a03a26e Compare December 30, 2025 23:41
@kcooney kcooney force-pushed the kcooney/revert-93 branch 2 times, most recently from 181c7e1 to 63f7396 Compare January 3, 2026 02:15
@kcooney kcooney force-pushed the kcooney/is-valid-setpoint branch from a03a26e to f01e9ea Compare January 3, 2026 02:15
@kcooney kcooney force-pushed the kcooney/is-valid-setpoint branch from f01e9ea to c9cb46f Compare January 3, 2026 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant