Skip to content

feat(application-container-creation-flow): add resources step#2459

Merged
RemiBonnet merged 2 commits intonew-navigationfrom
feat/new-nav/application-resources
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

feat(application-container-creation-flow): add resources step#2459
RemiBonnet merged 2 commits intonew-navigationfrom
feat/new-nav/application-resources

Conversation

@RemiBonnet
Copy link
Member

Summary

Add resources step for container/application creation flow

Screenshots / Recordings

Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 17 39 04

Testing

  • Changes tested locally in the relevant Console's pages and Storybooks
  • yarn test or yarn test -u (if you need to regenerate snapshots)
  • yarn format
  • yarn lint

PR Checklist

  • I followed naming, styling, and TypeScript rules (see .cursor/rules)
  • I performed a self-review (diff inspected, dead code removed)
  • I titled the PR using Conventional Commits with a scope when possible (e.g. feat(service): add new Terraform service) - required for semantic-release
  • I only kept necessary comments, written in English (watch for useless AI comments)
  • I involved a designer to validate UI changes if I am not a designer
  • I covered new business logic with tests (unit)
  • I confirmed CI is green (Codecov red can be accepted)
  • I reviewed and executed locally any AI-assisted code

@RemiBonnet
Copy link
Member Author

Qovery Preview

Qovery can create a Preview Environment for this PR.
To trigger its creation, please post a comment with one of the following command.

Command Blueprint environment
/qovery preview 15d69f24-9bc1-4a8d-80fe-d1bb1b2bcd00 New Navigation
/qovery preview {all|UUID1,UUID2,...} To preview multiple environments

This comment has been generated from Qovery AI 🤖.
Below, a word from its wisdom :

Make it work, make it right, make it fast

@RemiBonnet RemiBonnet marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2026 16:39
@RemiBonnet RemiBonnet added the V5 label Mar 9, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.85714% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.14%. Comparing base (e44af25) to head (cb8860c).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on new-navigation.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tings-resources/application-settings-resources.tsx 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...e/src/lib/hooks/use-environment/use-environment.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...tion-flow/application-container/step-resources.tsx 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           new-navigation    #2459      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           44.03%   44.14%   +0.11%     
==================================================
  Files                1044      555     -489     
  Lines               20277    12419    -7858     
  Branches             5865     3579    -2286     
==================================================
- Hits                 8928     5482    -3446     
+ Misses               9757     6026    -3731     
+ Partials             1592      911     -681     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 44.14% <42.85%> (+0.11%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@RemiBonnet RemiBonnet requested a review from rmnbrd March 10, 2026 10:07
@RemiBonnet RemiBonnet merged commit d71be04 into new-navigation Mar 10, 2026
11 checks passed
@RemiBonnet RemiBonnet deleted the feat/new-nav/application-resources branch March 10, 2026 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants