Conversation
Refactors Fermion to always mean FermionParity
Member
|
Look's good; really wondering what is going on with the x86 platform, but ignoring for now. Seems there are some conflicts though, so I cannot rebase and merge? |
Member
Author
|
It's mainly because I have had this locally for a while, the first commit predates quite a bit of the current history. The easiest solution is to squash and merge into a single commit, which keeps the linear history |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR changes the Fermion implementation such that only
FermionParityremains, all other fermionic charges are justProductChargewith fermionparity as a factor.