Hubbard SU(2) x SU(2) implementations #25
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lkdvos
requested review from
Yue-Zhengyuan and
sanderdemeyer
and removed request for
sanderdemeyer
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
lkdvos
force-pushed
the
hubbard_su2_su2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
67ee51e to
1c00f35
Compare
Jutho
reviewed
Aug 5, 2025
…nsorKitTensors.jl into hubbard_su2_su2
lkdvos
force-pushed
the
hubbard_su2_su2
branch
from
c24d809 to
0c87c9c
Compare
Yue-Zhengyuan
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds some functionality for working with the SU2 version of particle symmetry.
Since this only works at half-filling, I had to define a new number operator
(Nup - 1/2)(Ndwn - 1/2)and I don't really have a good name for that so suggestions are definitely welcome.I slightly reworked some of the hubbard tests to take some more random numbers, but I'm not actually sure if that made a difference. Everything does seem to pass, and the expected values are obtained, so I'm more or less certain that this is now correct.