Skip to content

Conversation

@ngoiyaeric
Copy link
Collaborator

@ngoiyaeric ngoiyaeric commented Jan 28, 2026

User description

I have recovered the missing changes by resetting the branch to the specific commit you identified (488b47c). This restoration includes the full history sidebar integration, the new integrated usage view, and various UI enhancements that were lost during the previous conflict resolution. The codebase is now exactly at the state you expected, with no remaining conflicts.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16847885310673003402 started by @ngoiyaeric


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Restore lost architectural improvements with integrated global state providers

  • Implement new UsageView component replacing legacy UsageSidebar for better UX

  • Add HistorySidebar with dedicated toggle context for history management

  • Enhance UI interactions with coordinated profile/usage/history view toggles

  • Update pricing popup with feature list and improved visual presentation


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Root Layout"] -->|wraps| B["HistoryToggleProvider"]
  B -->|wraps| C["UsageToggleProvider"]
  C -->|wraps| D["MapToggleProvider"]
  D -->|wraps| E["ProfileToggleProvider"]
  E -->|renders| F["HistorySidebar"]
  E -->|renders| G["Chat Component"]
  G -->|conditionally shows| H["UsageView"]
  G -->|conditionally shows| I["SettingsView"]
  G -->|conditionally shows| J["MapProvider"]
  K["Header"] -->|manages| L["Usage/History/Profile Toggles"]
  L -->|coordinates| M["View State Management"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
13 files
layout.tsx
Add global state providers for history and usage                 
+30/-22 
history-toggle-context.tsx
New context for managing history sidebar state                     
+30/-0   
history-sidebar.tsx
New sidebar component for chat history display                     
+35/-0   
history.tsx
Refactor to use global history toggle context                       
+16/-38 
usage-toggle-context.tsx
New context for managing usage view state                               
+30/-0   
usage-view.tsx
New integrated usage view component                                           
+96/-0   
usage-sidebar.tsx
Remove legacy usage sidebar component                                       
+0/-113 
chat.tsx
Integrate usage view with conditional rendering                   
+5/-2     
header.tsx
Add coordinated toggle handlers for views                               
+19/-8   
profile-toggle-context.tsx
Add closeProfileView method for view coordination               
+6/-1     
profile-toggle.tsx
Implement view coordination when opening profile                 
+12/-6   
conditional-lottie.tsx
Update visibility logic for usage view state                         
+4/-2     
purchase-credits-popup.tsx
Add feature list and improve pricing display                         
+21/-5   

Restored the branch to the expected head at commit 488b47c.
This recovers several missing features and architectural improvements:
- Integrated HistoryToggleProvider and HistorySidebar.
- Integrated UsageToggleProvider and the new UsageView component.
- Removed legacy usage-sidebar.tsx.
- Restored pricing and feature updates in PurchaseCreditsPopup.
- Fixed layout structure in app/layout.tsx to support these new global state providers.

Resolved previous merge conflicts and incorrect force-push state.

Co-authored-by: ngoiyaeric <115367894+ngoiyaeric@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 28, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
qcx Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 28, 2026 11:22am

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@charliecreates charliecreates bot requested a review from CharlieHelps January 28, 2026 11:21
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
Reverse tabnabbing

Description: window.open(..., '_blank') is used without noopener,noreferrer, enabling
reverse-tabnabbing where the newly opened page can access window.opener and potentially
redirect the original app page (same risk also appears in components/usage-view.tsx).
purchase-credits-popup.tsx [20-24]

Referred Code
export function PurchaseCreditsPopup({ isOpen, onClose }: PurchaseCreditsPopupProps) {
  const handlePurchase = () => {
    window.open('https://buy.stripe.com/3cIaEX3tRcur9EM7tbasg00', '_blank');
    onClose();
  };
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status:
Popup failure handling: The new external purchase flow uses window.open(...) without handling blocked popups or
providing any fallback/error UI when the action fails.

Referred Code
<Button size="sm" className="rounded-full px-4" onClick={() => window.open('https://buy.stripe.com/3cIaEX3tRcur9EM7tbasg00', '_blank')}>
  Upgrade
</Button>

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status:
External URL handling: The PR introduces a hardcoded external Stripe URL opened via window.open(...) without any
allowlist/centralization or runtime validation to reduce risk from future URL changes or
injection via refactors.

Referred Code
  window.open('https://buy.stripe.com/3cIaEX3tRcur9EM7tbasg00', '_blank');
  onClose();
};

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
High-level
Centralize UI state in one provider

Instead of using separate context providers for history, usage, and profile
views with scattered logic, consolidate them into a single state provider. This
provider would manage which overlay view is active, simplifying state management
and improving maintainability.

Examples:

components/profile-toggle.tsx [37-43]
  const handleSectionToggle = (section: ProfileToggleEnum) => {
    // If we're about to open a profile section and usage is open, close usage first
    if (activeView !== section && isUsageOpen) {
      closeUsage()
    }
    toggleProfileSection(section)
  }
components/header.tsx [31-37]
  const handleUsageToggle = () => {
    // If we're about to open usage and profile is open, close profile first
    if (!isUsageOpen && activeView) {
      closeProfileView()
    }
    toggleUsage()
  }

Solution Walkthrough:

Before:

// In profile-toggle.tsx
const { isUsageOpen, closeUsage } = useUsageToggle();
const handleSectionToggle = (section) => {
  if (isUsageOpen) {
    closeUsage(); // Profile toggle needs to know about usage
  }
  toggleProfileSection(section);
};

// In header.tsx
const { toggleUsage, isUsageOpen } = useUsageToggle();
const { activeView, closeProfileView } = useProfileToggle();
const handleUsageToggle = () => {
  if (activeView) {
    closeProfileView(); // Usage toggle needs to know about profile
  }
  toggleUsage();
};

After:

// In a new ui-state-provider.tsx
const UIStateContext = createContext(...);
export const UIStateProvider = ({ children }) => {
  const [activeView, setActiveView] = useState(null); // e.g., 'usage', 'profile.settings', 'history'

  const setView = (view) => {
    setActiveView(prev => (prev === view ? null : view));
  };

  return <UIStateContext.Provider value={{ activeView, setView }}>...
};

// In header.tsx or profile-toggle.tsx
const { setView } = useUIState();
// ...
// <Button onClick={() => setView('usage')}>Usage</Button>
// <Button onClick={() => setView('profile.settings')}>Settings</Button>
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a significant architectural flaw where view-toggling logic is scattered across multiple components, leading to a brittle and hard-to-maintain system.

High
Possible issue
Fix race condition in toggle logic

Simplify the logic in handleSectionToggle to unconditionally close the usage
panel if it's open when a profile section is toggled, preventing both from being
displayed simultaneously.

components/profile-toggle.tsx [37-43]

 const handleSectionToggle = (section: ProfileToggleEnum) => {
   // If we're about to open a profile section and usage is open, close usage first
-  if (activeView !== section && isUsageOpen) {
+  if (isUsageOpen) {
     closeUsage()
   }
   toggleProfileSection(section)
 }
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a flaw in the view toggling logic that could lead to overlapping UI elements, and the proposed fix is more robust and simpler than the original implementation.

Medium
Improve view toggling logic for robustness

Refactor handleUsageToggle to unconditionally close any active profile view
before toggling the usage view, ensuring the views are always mutually
exclusive.

components/header.tsx [31-37]

 const handleUsageToggle = () => {
-  // If we're about to open usage and profile is open, close profile first
-  if (!isUsageOpen && activeView) {
+  // If a profile view is active, close it before toggling usage.
+  if (activeView) {
     closeProfileView()
   }
   toggleUsage()
 }
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a flaw in the view toggling logic that could lead to overlapping UI elements, and the proposed fix is more robust and simpler than the original implementation.

Medium
  • More

@ngoiyaeric ngoiyaeric merged commit ae085cf into feature/billing-integration Jan 28, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
Copy link

@charliecreates charliecreates bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The biggest concern is overlay coordination: history, usage, and profile can now be opened independently, likely leading to conflicting UI states and focus/scroll issues. UsageView currently looks stateful but is effectively static mock data, which should be simplified to reduce confusion. There are also a couple of maintainability concerns (duplicated Stripe URL and brittle onOpenChange={setHistoryOpen} handler) that will make future changes riskier.

Additional notes (4)
  • Maintainability | components/history-sidebar.tsx:19-32
    The SheetContent width is fixed to w-64 with no explicit side. Depending on your Sheet implementation defaults, this may slide in from an unexpected side and can be cramped on larger screens.

More importantly, there’s no coordination logic preventing history from opening while usage/settings are open (you added this coordination for usage vs profile). That can create overlapping panels and confusing UX. If multiple overlays can exist, consider enforcing a single active overlay at a time.

  • Readability | components/chat.tsx:110-114
    This nested ternary is starting to get hard to read/extend. It also encodes UI precedence (usage > settings > map) in two places (mobile + desktop), which invites drift later.

  • Maintainability | components/header.tsx:27-27
    Header opens the purchase popup unconditionally on mount (setIsPurchaseOpen(true) in useEffect). That forces a modal on every app load, which is a major UX regression unless this is strictly intended for a limited scenario (e.g., credit-exhausted users).

If this modal is meant to appear only when the user actually hits a credit limit, it should be triggered from that condition rather than on mount.

  • Maintainability | components/purchase-credits-popup.tsx:23-24
    handlePurchase and the Upgrade button in UsageView both open a Stripe URL via window.open. This duplicates the URL in multiple places, making future changes error-prone and risking divergence (especially across environments).
Summary of changes

What this PR changes

  • Restores global UI state providers in app/layout.tsx

    • Wraps the app in new HistoryToggleProvider and UsageToggleProvider alongside existing providers.
    • Mounts a new global HistorySidebar next to the existing Sidebar.
  • Replaces legacy usage sidebar behavior with an integrated view

    • Deletes components/usage-sidebar.tsx.
    • Adds components/usage-view.tsx and components/usage-toggle-context.tsx.
    • Updates components/chat.tsx to render <UsageView /> when usage is toggled open (both mobile and desktop right pane).
  • Adds history sidebar + toggle context

    • Adds components/history-sidebar.tsx and components/history-toggle-context.tsx.
    • Refactors components/history.tsx to act as a simple toggle button (no longer owns the Sheet).
    • Updates components/header.tsx so clicking the logo toggles history and introduces a coordinated usage toggle.
  • UI/UX tweaks

    • components/conditional-lottie.tsx: hides the loading animation when either settings/profile view or usage view is open.
    • components/purchase-credits-popup.tsx: expands plan details to show a yearly price and feature checklist.
    • components/profile-toggle-context.tsx and components/profile-toggle.tsx: adds closeProfileView() and coordinates closing usage when opening profile sections.

Comment on lines +15 to +21
export function HistorySidebar() {
const { isHistoryOpen, setHistoryOpen } = useHistoryToggle()

return (
<Sheet open={isHistoryOpen} onOpenChange={setHistoryOpen}>
<SheetContent className="w-64 rounded-tl-xl rounded-bl-xl" data-testid="history-panel">
<SheetHeader>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<Sheet open={isHistoryOpen} onOpenChange={setHistoryOpen}> passes setHistoryOpen directly as the handler. Many sheet/dialog components call onOpenChange(open: boolean) but some call with additional args or an event-like payload. Passing a raw setter is brittle and makes it harder to add side-effects later (e.g., closing other overlays when history opens).

Suggestion

Wrap the handler to lock the contract to a boolean and to give yourself a single place to coordinate overlays later.

<Sheet
  open={isHistoryOpen}
  onOpenChange={(open) => setHistoryOpen(open)}
>

If you want coordination (recommended), this is also where you can close Usage / Profile when open === true. Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this change.

Comment on lines +1 to +17
'use client'

import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'
import { Table, TableBody, TableCell, TableHead, TableHeader, TableRow } from '@/components/ui/table'
import { Zap, RefreshCw, LayoutPanelLeft, Minus } from 'lucide-react'
import { useUsageToggle } from './usage-toggle-context'

export function UsageView() {
const [usage] = useState([
{ details: 'Efficiently Fix Pull Request ...', date: '2026-01-17 08:05', change: -418 },
{ details: 'Fix Build and Add Parallel S...', date: '2026-01-16 06:10', change: -482 },
{ details: 'How to Add a Feature to a ...', date: '2026-01-14 10:42', change: -300 },
])
const [credits] = useState(0)
const { toggleUsage } = useUsageToggle()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UsageView uses useState for constant mock data (usage, credits) and imports useEffect but does not use it. Even if ESLint passes, this is still unnecessary runtime work and makes future wiring to real data harder to reason about (because it looks stateful but isn't).

Suggestion

Make the mock data constants (or module-level constants) and remove the unused useEffect import.

import React from 'react'

const MOCK_USAGE = [
  { details: 'Efficiently Fix Pull Request ...', date: '2026-01-17 08:05', change: -418 },
  // ...
]
const MOCK_CREDITS = 0

export function UsageView() {
  const usage = MOCK_USAGE
  const credits = MOCK_CREDITS
  const { toggleUsage } = useUsageToggle()
  // ...
}

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this refactor.

Comment on lines +3 to +16
import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'
import { Table, TableBody, TableCell, TableHead, TableHeader, TableRow } from '@/components/ui/table'
import { Zap, RefreshCw, LayoutPanelLeft, Minus } from 'lucide-react'
import { useUsageToggle } from './usage-toggle-context'

export function UsageView() {
const [usage] = useState([
{ details: 'Efficiently Fix Pull Request ...', date: '2026-01-17 08:05', change: -418 },
{ details: 'Fix Build and Add Parallel S...', date: '2026-01-16 06:10', change: -482 },
{ details: 'How to Add a Feature to a ...', date: '2026-01-14 10:42', change: -300 },
])
const [credits] = useState(0)
const { toggleUsage } = useUsageToggle()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UsageView stores static mock data in useState and even imports useEffect but doesn’t use it. Since the values are constant and not updated, using state here adds unnecessary React state machinery and re-render semantics, and it makes it harder to later swap in real data fetching logic.

Also, the table rows use key={i}. If this ever becomes real dynamic data, index keys will cause subtle UI bugs on insert/reorder (rows reusing wrong DOM/state).

Suggestion

Use plain constants for the mock data (or fetch via an effect), remove the unused useEffect import, and use a stable key (e.g., derive an id or combine date+details).

import React from 'react'

const usage = [
  { details: 'Efficiently Fix Pull Request ...', date: '2026-01-17 08:05', change: -418 },
  // ...
]
const credits = 0

// ...
{usage.map((item) => (
  <TableRow key={`${item.date}:${item.details}`}> {/* replace with real id when available */}
    {/* ... */}
  </TableRow>
))}

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.

Comment on lines +25 to +28
<Button variant="ghost" size="icon" onClick={toggleUsage}>
<Minus className="h-6 w-6" />
<span className="sr-only">Close usage</span>
</Button>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The usage panel close button uses toggleUsage(). If usage can be opened/closed from multiple entry points, a toggle-based close can accidentally open usage when state gets out of sync (e.g., double-clicks, concurrent state updates, or future code paths that call this handler when already closed).

A close affordance should be idempotent and call a dedicated closeUsage() instead.

Suggestion

Use closeUsage() for the close button so the action is deterministic.

const { closeUsage } = useUsageToggle()

<Button variant="ghost" size="icon" onClick={closeUsage}>
  <Minus className="h-6 w-6" />
  <span className="sr-only">Close usage</span>
</Button>

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.

Comment on lines +27 to +37
const { toggleUsage, isUsageOpen } = useUsageToggle()
const { activeView, closeProfileView } = useProfileToggle()
const { toggleHistory } = useHistoryToggle()

const handleUsageToggle = () => {
// If we're about to open usage and profile is open, close profile first
if (!isUsageOpen && activeView) {
closeProfileView()
}
toggleUsage()
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

handleUsageToggle closes the profile view when opening usage, but the inverse coordination is handled elsewhere (ProfileToggle closes usage when opening a profile section). History is now also a global overlay, but it isn't coordinated with either usage or profile. This will likely allow multiple overlays to be open at once (history sheet + usage view), which can produce confusing input focus/scroll behavior.

Suggestion

Centralize overlay coordination so only one of {history, usage, profile} can be open at a time. A minimal improvement is to close history when opening usage and close usage when opening history.

Example (in handleUsageToggle):

if (!isUsageOpen) {
  closeProfileView()
  setHistoryOpen(false) // or a `closeHistory()` helper
}
toggleUsage()

You may want to add closeHistory() to HistoryToggleContextType for symmetry. Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit implementing this coordination.

};

const features = [
'Internet Search',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dialog's onOpenChange callback receives the next open boolean, but this component ignores it and always calls onClose(). That means opening the dialog via internal triggers (or re-opening due to state changes) can immediately call onClose() and fight state, and it also prevents supporting controlled open/close semantics cleanly.

This is a correctness issue with Radix/Shadcn controlled dialogs: you should close only when open becomes false.

Suggestion

Update onOpenChange to respect the boolean and only close when it transitions to false.

<Dialog
  open={isOpen}
  onOpenChange={(open) => {
    if (!open) onClose()
  }}
>

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.

@charliecreates charliecreates bot removed the request for review from CharlieHelps January 28, 2026 11:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants