ReviewArmor V1.1 case study — InfoBlend's manifest tightening, 56 → 89

[RIxiV1]

ReviewArmor's V1.1 release uses InfoBlend's pre-submission scan as the worked example for the new severity rubric — full write-up at https://reviewarmor.dev/case-studies/infoblend by Yuan (@onebluecloud).

This thread is the place to ask questions about the diff, the reasoning behind the rubric split, or anything that comes up in the scan output. I'll also post the actual Chrome Web Store review outcome here once it lands, so this isn't a frozen snapshot — it'll have a longitudinal update once a human reviewer at Google weighs in on the same manifest.

Discussion welcome.

[onebluecloud]

Thanks Suhaib — happy with how the cross-link landed on both ends.

For anyone arriving here from the case study: questions about the rubric split, the manifest diff, or anything in the ReviewArmor scan output are welcome. I'll also post here whenever the CWS review outcome on InfoBlend lands, so this thread becomes the single source of truth for the longitudinal "what did the scanner predict vs what actually happened" comparison.